Nicholas van Whatsisface
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 2,717
Not really. We don't need to sell, & the player says he won't kick up a fuss if the transfer doesn't happen.
We apparently leaked our £85m valuation. Barça have leaked their £55m offer. As it stands no official offer has been received, so we've had no official offers to decline.
As for Barça being the only gig in town? If Bernardo's made his future wishes clear, why would any other club make or leak an offer if Bernardo's management tell all & sundry it's Barça or remain at City?
The other thing pointed out last week was if Bernardo was Barça's No1 target, why've they spent £160m on other targets & left Silva so late in the window?
Again, this seems to come down to moving FDJ on to lose his huge wage & to fund Bernardo's transfer. This is why most believe FDJ & Bernardo's transfers are inextricably linked.
The other issue is Bernardo's replacement. I doubt we'd want to go through the season with £85m burning a hole in our pocket, but a Bernardo sized hole in our squad.
I doubt we've not made contingency plans for Bernardo moving on, but if these transfers do happen late in the window, whose to say the club who have the player we've earmarked as a Bernardo replacement will have time to find their replacement?
It's obvious Bernardo wants to leave & to be honest I want him gone so we can end all the speculation, settle down & move on with our season without further distractions.
If I was a betting man, at this late stage I'd say Bernardo is more likely to stay than leave & will get his move next summer for a similar fee to the speculated £85m we want this transfer window...
Absolutely - in the rest of my post, I did make the point about our strength over the deal with Brighton being the fact we don’t need to sell, so we’re not disagreeing with each other in any way!