his contract is until 2025 without renewal and next year with one year left city would have to sell him for cheap so whats the point of release clauseHis contract runs until 2028
his contract is until 2025 without renewal and next year with one year left city would have to sell him for cheap so whats the point of release clauseHis contract runs until 2028
Bah, got confused by your wording. Thought we were talking about Julian....his contract is until 2025 without renewal and next year with one year left city would have to sell him for cheap so whats the point of release clause
I’ve no issue with that at all, if Barça cough up the valuation of any player we have then they can go. The same applies to any player or any club. We are a business and our feelings as fans mean nothing in reality in relation to said business. We may not like it but players come and go, it’s how it’s always been and always will be.He wants to go to Barca at some point
Wasnt that arsed about PSG, gets a bumper payrise for a year and if Barca pay up the RC he can go there next summer if they don’t he see’s it out on 300k a week.
Your mate is tom hanks and I claim my butter.Forever I think unless they sack him.
and make space for the new wagePlus side of a release clause is that Barca have to pay it all upfront. Not convinced they'll be able to afford that anyway.
Disgusting City force player to stay and pickup 160K per weekHahaha the stupid bitter ****.
State owned and refused to sell.
Hostage takers.
Poor John will get his soggy wet nose pushed out when Mrs Silva squeezes out the ankle biterIt’ll be a caesarian. Wealthy people don’t shell em like the rest.
In and out in a few days, all planned and I’m sure an army of carers/nanny to help.
giving him like 300k a week is dumb if hes leaving next yearWe won’t know until he’s sold what the release clause value is (or if there is one), but it makes sense that there would be one. Logically, a guy that’s wanted to leave for 2+ years signing a 1 year extension is not a guy committing his long term future to the club. We’d love it to be, but it isn’t. So a release clause makes sense, or simply just us preserving his value ahead of next summer. But I really don’t think his desire to leave has gone away. The new deal will either be to make it easier for him to leave (a reasonable release clause), or it will be for City’s benefit in terms of not seeing his value deteriorate too much. There’ll be an understanding between both parties that this is not to block his departure or put an end to it. That’s just common sense imo. Nothing wrong with it either, we know Bernardo is able to forget about his future when he’s on the pitch and will always give everything he has.
Stupid ? So please enlighten us .this bernardo RC news is either bollocks or the clubs taking the piss. i dont see how it makes sense. without the new deal, hed have 2 years left, 1 year left next summer which means wed be forced to accept lower bids or lose him on a free the very next summer.
with the new deal, you basically double his wages and still let him leave next summer for 47m? that is just stupid.
can you read?Stupid ? So please enlighten us .
No I’m blind . Tell me what other smart options would you advise the board?can you read?