No. Has anyone said why this should be the case though?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bloody Sunday: Soldier F faces murder charges
- Thread starter laughing gravy
- Start date
No. Has anyone said why this should be the case though?
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
Then you’re arguing with the wind.No. Has anyone said why this should be the case though?
The point has continually been made about the unfairness of it all.
The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 8,579
Regardless of the what the IRA did, which was a despicable murderous campaign,No. Has anyone said why this should be the case though?
Whats your thoughts on the soldier/soldiers that opened fire on the unarmed civilians?
Last edited:
blueish swede
Well-Known Member
No. Has anyone said why this should be the case though?
Isn't it simply because the commission found sufficient evidence to enable a prosecution of soldier F to proceed. Are there any other soldiers, Republican terrorists or Loyalist terrorists where there is sufficient evidence but they have not been prosecuted - excluding those cases that the NI police force screwed up in 2007?
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
No. Has anyone said why this should be the case though?
Wasting your time mate and you should back out fo the thread before you blow a gasket.
Soldier F has my full support as do all our servicemen and women asked to do things on behalf of the government a majority of us couldnt even begin to imagine.
My old man did 3 tours from 1970 onwards with 2nd Battalion RRF and as i said earlier in the thread, but for my Uncle Ste who passed away today god bless him offering us a lift back to Catterick garrison in 74 my mum, me and my unborn brother would have been sat directly on top of the bomb the murdering twats blew up on the M62.
Ask any squaddie from those days what it was like going out on a brickie patrol, losing mates and knowing full well who was the bad guy but not being able to do diddly squat most of the time because of them having their hands tied behind their backs in red tape whilst the bad guys carried on murdering.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,229
Wasting your time mate and you should back out fo the thread before you blow a gasket.
Soldier F has my full support as do all our servicemen and women asked to do things on behalf of the government a majority of us couldnt even begin to imagine.
My old man did 3 tours from 1970 onwards with 2nd Battalion RRF and as i said earlier in the thread, but for my Uncle Ste who passed away today god bless him offering us a lift back to Catterick garrison in 74 my mum, me and my unborn brother would have been sat directly on top of the bomb the murdering twats blew up on the M62.
Ask any squaddie from those days what it was like going out on a brickie patrol, losing mates and knowing full well who was the bad guy but not being able to do diddly squat most of the time because of them having their hands tied behind their backs in red tape whilst the bad guys carried on murdering.
Soldier F has your full support? What precisely do you support him doing?
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Soldier F has your full support? What precisely do you support him doing?
I fully support him being allowed to live his days out in the same way NI terrorists are being allowed.
The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 8,579
Murdering 17 year old kids, a fuckin shockin post which he should be ashamed of.Soldier F has your full support? What precisely do you support him doing?
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Murdering 17 year old kids, a fuckin shockin post which he should be ashamed of.
I can tell you i am in no way shape or form ashamed of my post or my opinion on this matter, one borne out of experience.
I was aksed how he has my support and ive given my answer, see above.
You twist it however you want.
Wasting your time mate and you should back out fo the thread before you blow a gasket.
Soldier F has my full support as do all our servicemen and women asked to do things on behalf of the government a majority of us couldnt even begin to imagine.
My old man did 3 tours from 1970 onwards with 2nd Battalion RRF and as i said earlier in the thread, but for my Uncle Ste who passed away today god bless him offering us a lift back to Catterick garrison in 74 my mum, me and my unborn brother would have been sat directly on top of the bomb the murdering twats blew up on the M62.
Ask any squaddie from those days what it was like going out on a brickie patrol, losing mates and knowing full well who was the bad guy but not being able to do diddly squat most of the time because of them having their hands tied behind their backs in red tape whilst the bad guys carried on murdering.
I am indeed, out of here.
I've answered several questions about my thoughts on the matter but not had one reply as to why Soldier F should be treated differently to terrorist suspects.
Not one.