mrcunny said:
Was there any need for this?
bluetoby said:
yeah kinda. look at the words.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
yes they have some questionable policies but if you take the racist shit out they also spoke a lot of sense.
ok, let's walk through this (BETTER MAKE SURE I DON'T MAKE A SLIGHT ERROR IN TYPING BECAUSE THEN MY ARGUMENT WILL BE BLOWN RIGHT OUT OF THE WATER EH? LOLZORZ!!!111one!!!)
brooklandsblue2.0 said:
“YES THEY HAVE SOME QUESTIONABLE POLICIES...â€
Okay, there's the first bit, readily agreeing to the fact the BNP have some 'QUESTIONABLE' policies. Which ones? I'll start with this:
"The BNP stands for the preservation of the national and ethnic character of the British people and is wholly opposed to any form of racial integration between British and non-European peoples. It is therefore committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration".
"The BNP makes much of its policy of voluntary repatriation but if you read the small print it states clearly that the option of compulsory repatriation would be open to any BNP government".
So, you can tell any non-white friends about 'all the sense they spoke if you ignore ALL THE RACIST SHIT as you're waving them off on the boat back to where their grandparents came from.
What's that you say? You want to hear about the impact these 'questionable' policies will have? Maybe the whole dismantling of the NHS once 16% of nurses and 58% of new doctors are "sent back where they came from".
I'm sure you and your non-white chums find those policies very questionable. Or do your non-white friends that you buy kebabs from or coach football to find those policies a little bit more than questionable? Do they find these policies mildly outrageous, or full on outrageous. Next time you're in Abduls please ask the friendly staff behind the counter if they think those policies are questionable.
These policies are fronted by Nick Griffin, a man who believes homosexuality is a "disorder which shortens life expectancy by decades, and has brought the world one of the most deadly plagues since the Black Death." He wrote after a gay pub was bombed that "TV footage of dozens of gay demonstrators flaunting their perversions in front of the world's journalists showed just why so many ordinary people find these creatures so repulsive." Be sure to also ask any of your non-heterosexual friends if they are in fact repulsive creatures, or see if they too think that the BNP's policies are a tad questionable.
brooklandsblue2.0 said:
“... IF YOU TAKE THE RACIST SHIT OUT THEY ALSO SPOKE A LOT OF SENSEâ€
This is my main gripe, because if you believe that the BNP is right, if you think that non-whites should be sent back to the home of their grand-parents because it will have a direct positive impact on your life, then I understand where you're coming from, regardless of the basic human rights issues.
If, as I believe is the case from my understanding Brooklandsblue2.0, you think that the racist shit is as you so eloquently call it 'Racist Shit', surely that's it. Surely that's a line that you don't cross. If you really really really (delete repeated word? No, it's for emphasis thanks MSWord) REALLY believe that it is racism that their party is built on and that that (delete repeated word? No thanks MSWord, that's actually grammatically correct believe it or not dude!) racism is 'shit' then you can't go further than that to find any nuggets of 'speaking sense' deeper within, because it all comes from that root. There is no non-racist strand of the BNP, there's nothing cool and groovy, lefty and liberal about it. If you disagree with their main point, then the rest is worthless to you.
I can't get my head round the thinking that you can just ignore their massive flaws to find one or two buzzphrases that latch on to current public worry about our current government and think that it makes sense. It's like knowing your best mate does snatch and grab muggings of old ladies, but letting it slide because he gives you lifts to places. You can't take the racist shit out of the BNP if you truly think that it is 'Racist Shit'. You can't do it. You're either with them or against them. The BNP is an far-right party and the fact that they can sway so many people who don't share their extreme views. Far right man! Not just 'a bit right wing', fucking FAR RIGHT. If you think they speak sense, at least admit that you agree with most of what they have to say and stop trying to be all liberal as well.
I have to admit that I didn't get my shit together in time to vote at all and I'm truly horrified at myself. I am absolutely GUTTED that I didn't vote.
Now, my representatives will align themselves with Dutch, Austrian, Danish and Hungarian fascists for a lovely shiny white Europe.
"Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP, was today elected to the European parliament.
The far-right leader won a seat in the North West region. Earlier Andrew Brons, another BNP politician won in the Yorkshire and Humber area. It is the first time the party has had an MEP elected."
The BNP claimed the victory was "kicking back against racism, because racism in this country is now directed overwhelmingly against people who look like me." (WHITE)
"The BNP succeeded because the other parties failed... In the North West just 2,500 more votes for the UKIP or slightly over 5,000 more for the Greens would have deprived Griffin of a seat.
The fact that nearly 70% of the electorate in these regions did not think it worth while to defend democracy by voting probably also made it easier for the BNP to gain the proportion of votes it needed.
The BNP vote in these regions fell compared to 2004, but low turnout from disillusioned voters allowed it to gain seats."
That's my own turmoil but at least I don't think any one of those shower are speaking any sense.
Love and Kisses
AK's40YL