Bookies affordability checks - Big Brother wants to see your bank statements !

These affordability checks are utter nonsense. It will simply drive punters back to the old days and placing bets with unlicensed, SP bookies. They will not stop anyone from gambling. On top of that it’s an abuse of people’s civil liberties. Some people enjoy drinking. That’s OK. Ciggies, then fill your boots. Having a bet, now hold on a minute. Joke.
 
Enjoy a flutter on the match ?

If you are a punter, racing fan, footie fan, work within sport or simply care about personal freedom, you should add your name to the petition launched on Wednesday night for the government to scrap the implementation of affordability checks.

In all probability, most members won't need reminding that affordability checks are objectionable, poorly conceived and should be scrapped, but just in case, here are five important reasons why you should sign the petition:

Affordability checks are an attack on our civil liberties​

Affordability checks have become such a common feature of gambling for many that it is easy to forget just what an unprecedented attack on our basic freedoms they are. Never before has a British government attempted to interfere in how individuals spend their own money. It is hard to think of a more objectionable real-world example of the 'nanny state' than the government insisting on financial checks for those deemed to be spending too much of their own money.

I'm not a betting person but this is definitely the government trying to bring in a china style surveillance system, 1984 and a brave new world might have been labelled works of fiction but they were actually grave warnings, people shouldn't be okay with this not in the slightest it's an attack on your freedom they're overstepping their boundaries.

My dad funnily enough is banned from betting on the golf as he knows his shit and always wins and I mean literally always wins, William Hill told him the max he could bet on the golf after a ban on it was 10p as they were worried he was gambling too much, then being the moral upholders they are on the very same day they let him bet a grand on the football...

The reality was he was always winning while betting on the golf, versus much less frequently when betting on the football.
 
How could you get a bank account without a Spanish address?
Slight aside, but with the Wise banking app, you can get an Aus, Canadian, Hungarian, NZ, Romanian, Singapore or Turkish Bank account, from the UK, without needing an address in foreign lands. Also earns GB interest - currently 4.87%. You can also open a Euro account (and many others) and get a Swift/BIC & IBAN number - but I don't think that's as feature rich as the others listed.
 
It's to make sure you are not a professional footballer betting incognito!
 
I'm not a betting person but this is definitely the government trying to bring in a china style surveillance system, 1984 and a brave new world might have been labelled works of fiction but they were actually grave warnings, people shouldn't be okay with this not in the slightest it's an attack on your freedom they're overstepping their boundaries.

My dad funnily enough is banned from betting on the golf as he knows his shit and always wins and I mean literally always wins, William Hill told him the max he could bet on the golf after a ban on it was 10p as they were worried he was gambling too much, then being the moral upholders they are on the very same day they let him bet a grand on the football...

The reality was he was always winning while betting on the golf, versus much less frequently when betting on the football.
Stake restrictions aren't uncommon and can sometimes be sport specific. To be clear though the reason your dad was restricted won't be because he won it will be he cut into their overround.
Remember that if the book paid out your dad's bet because he took a winning selection they kept many other peoples money who selected a losing player.
The way a book makes money is by having an "overround" of about 105% so the book pays out 100% and keeps 5% as profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PPT
Bit late for a petition. Most firms jumped the gun and got rid of the punters they wanted to get rid of, long before it was ever compulsory.

Gambling game has gone. It’s now run entirely for the benefit of your 5p lucky 15, mug punter.
 
Stake restrictions aren't uncommon and can sometimes be sport specific. To be clear though the reason your dad was restricted won't be because he won it will be he cut into their overround.
Remember that if the book paid out your dad's bet because he took a winning selection they kept many other peoples money who selected a losing player.
The way a book makes money is by having an "overround" of about 105% so the book pays out 100% and keeps 5% as profit.
Ta for that. ok. I get the totalling up of the odds (say on a football match, home win, away win, draw).
But, presumably the odds on those 3 combinations are constantly having to be adjusted, because of varying betting amounts across the 3 scenarios, to ensure that whatever the final result the payout for one scenario is covered (plus profit) by money taken in on the other 2 scenarios. I can see that happening in the compuetr age, but i'm in awe of the bookmakers who manage to do it in their head(s)/books.
 
Ta for that. ok. I get the totalling up of the odds (say on a football match, home win, away win, draw).
But, presumably the odds on those 3 combinations are constantly having to be adjusted, because of varying betting amounts across the 3 scenarios, to ensure that whatever the final result the payout for one scenario is covered (plus profit) by money taken in on the other 2 scenarios. I can see that happening in the compuetr age, but i'm in awe of the bookmakers who manage to do it in their head(s)/books.
Yes, odds are constantly updated-essentially the more money that is bet on one outcome the shorter the odds on that outcome will become, odds on other outcomes attracting less money will lengthen and pay more.
 
Not surprising at all anyone who chooses to give money to these crooks is a fool

Why are they a fool? It’s a service? If you buy a pint for £4 are you a fool? No, it’s something to enjoy.
£4 on an acca would last longer than it would to drink a pint and at the end of the enjoyment you might get some cash.

When it comes to betting people only focus on the addicts. What about the hundreds of thousands who just enjoy a few quid on the footy each week?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.