Hilarious. How about playing a predominantly passing game but with passion and having it in our locker to go long if, for example, we have been passing it round for 80 minutes in front of a packed defence, getting absolutely nowhere. Why not as well as having a load of silky footballers, have the odd player who can get stuck in when other teams are kicking us off the park rather than relying on refs who invariably let them bully us? Why does it all have to be either or? Why does passing football have to mean ignoring lots of other facets of the game, why seemingly does attacking football mean we have to be terrible at defending? How about we bring a bit of balance to the table rather than have the people running the club telling us that we have a set way of playing as a matter of principle and that we cannot veer from that? I'd like us to focus on winning football matches rather than focusing on trying to impersonate Barca at all costs.
Didn't Arsenal fans demand a midfield bully to compliment their possession players?
That's why they ended up with Granit Xhaka.
Please no.
Our failings are largely due to losing Gundogan who was potentially the man to fill the middle role with or without Silva, our lack of striking options without Jesus and that our play tends to be run down the edges to the byline with shit wing backs.
I don't think a lot needs to be done outside wing backs who can pass/cross with some accuracy.
We scored 5 at home against Monaco and beat Barca in the champs league and clearly outplayed Chelsea and Tottenham at home but for some dodgy calls.
The blades out for Pep are ridiculous in the extreme. I think the club and Pep knew this season would be difficult given the change of style and the players available.
It will take a few weeks next season to get new players up to speed but I expect to be blazing these fuckers by round 10.