Boycott MOTD

[jimharri]

...because MON got sacked they bumped United to first....

why did they do this?

 

[Mad Eyed Screamer]

No point boycotting it, the viewing figures wont affect potential companies who would like to advertise their products during the commercial breaks......

Now boycotting your TV licence..... ;)

 

[Oystercatcher28]

I'd personally like to see a return to highlights rather than over analysis. The billing for me matters not. Less Hansen and Linekar, more football.

 

[norfstander]

Never really understood why people regularly have a bit of a cry about this sort of thing. Yes, this week, we should've been on earlier, arguably first, but we have no devine right, and it's not hugely important.

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

I couldn't give less fucks if I tried

 

[ell]

-- Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:48 am --

What cracked me up is the fact that because MON got sacked they bumped United to first, why did they do this?

Interesting you say they bumped United to first when you've already answered your own question within the question itself. I would say the reason they bumped that match first was because MON got sacked, so in effect they bumped Sunderland to the first match, not United. If they'd have been playing Wigan it would have been the same.

No youve missed my point. What does MON being sacked have to do with the schedule? Im not claiming agenda by the way

 

[Pigeonho]

I couldn't give less fucks if I tried

It's a mad one isn't it how they get to annoyed about something so meaningless. What does it matter? All clubs get shown so whether it's 1st, 3rd or 5th who cares?<br /><br />-- Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:07 pm --<br /><br />

-- Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:48 am --

What cracked me up is the fact that because MON got sacked they bumped United to first, why did they do this?

Interesting you say they bumped United to first when you've already answered your own question within the question itself. I would say the reason they bumped that match first was because MON got sacked, so in effect they bumped Sunderland to the first match, not United. If they'd have been playing Wigan it would have been the same.

No youve missed my point. What does MON being sacked have to do with the schedule? Im not claiming agenda by the way

Maybe because it was a shock-sacking and they wanted to show that match first to report it after the highlights? On that basis then they didn't bump United, they bumped the team that the sacking was to do with - Sunderland.

 

[mancitymick]

City are always on First. Record it then fast forward. Simples

 

[Didsbury Dave]

I couldn't give less fucks if I tried

It's a mad one isn't it how they get to annoyed about something so meaningless. What does it matter? All clubs get shown so whether it's 1st, 3rd or 5th who cares?

-- Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:07 pm --

-- Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:48 am --


Interesting you say they bumped United to first when you've already answered your own question within the question itself. I would say the reason they bumped that match first was because MON got sacked, so in effect they bumped Sunderland to the first match, not United. If they'd have been playing Wigan it would have been the same.

No youve missed my point. What does MON being sacked have to do with the schedule? Im not claiming agenda by the way

Maybe because it was a shock-sacking and they wanted to show that match first to report it after the highlights? On that basis then they didn't bump United, they bumped the team that the sacking was to do with - Sunderland.

They get annoyed because they see the world through narrowed eyes. It's a sad trait amongst many football fans of all clubs, but we have it worse because we had 20 years in United's shadow. And now we've caught them up they are always counting, always ticking checkboxes, always acting sentry.

 

[Impeccable]

Arsed.