mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Mister Appointment said:mosssideblue said:Mister Appointment said:If we're talking ideal - my ideal is that if Pellegrini's decision is to play the strongest available XI in any given cup game, then he should have to accommodate one academy player for the sake of one first team player. For me that's not a compromise. If you're a top manager, you can handle dropping one kid with a bag of potential into one position, if he's surrounded by first team regulars to guide him through. Also it's a realistic way to evaluate how a promising youngster integrates in a match situation with the first XI.
On that basis, I'd have no problem with Pellegrini taking the decision to play Barker (or Ambrose or Lopes if he wasn't on loan) for Milner (or Navas) this weekend. For me it's not a risk if the intention is to play the best X around him.
I accept your point, but only if the 1st team were cruising. The fact is were not and we need them to sort that pronto. To me that is a higher priority than blooding a youngster in a cup game against "lesser" opposition
I don't think it's about the first team cruising, it's about them being available.
Let me put it another way. If we play Barker this weekend we won't lose because we played him instead of Milner. All he needs to do is be a functional part of the first team and against lower league opposition, the rest should and 99 times out of a 100 will take care of itself.
Agree we shouldn't lose, even with two or at a push three new lads in. I'm thinking to the following week when we meet the chavs and our first team didn't play the week previous because we were playing a cup game against lower opposition, and one or two were left out.
We need our first team firing on all cylinders in London and to me, playing them together this week to iron out last weeks failings is the way ahead, otherwise they will rock up at SB without clearing their collective deamons.
Not saying don't have any on the bench, or not bring any on, but lets sort the team first.