Brentford (A) - Post-Match Thread

Whichever way we look at it, the problem is always the degree of variability of decisions being open to interpretation.
Cuases of this can include the fundamental definitions of what constitutes on/off/where/when lines should be set etc.

If we're going to go for as accurate as possible, then it almost doesn't matter what you choose to measure from; as long as it is possible to set a rule/measure that can be consistently calibrated, you're heading in the right direction.

My feeling is that the shirt sleeve rule is too variable as some shirts may be adjusted,some players have longer arms, some wear long sleeves. There is no definitive point for everyone.

And I'm quite OK with players not being able to tell to within 1cm/whatever - that's part of the skill of playing the game - their judgment. And of course, if things could be know to be reliably exact, then we shouldn't have any qualms with the truth.

There is of course, a way to ensure you are onside. (Check). But to push the limits, as in any competition, there is an event of risk required , and sometimes you'll get it wrong.

VAR probably has improved the game from a technical correctness point of view, and will occasionally suffer from issues that either can't be addressed perfectly, or are part of the learning curve.

But in getting more precise, it highlights the areas where there is a lack of consistency in its own processes. And when that inconsistency is down to the humans who implemented it not having thought things through well enough (perhaps deliberately so), then that's what grinds gears.
The huge human reaction to perceived unfairness.
I agree to an extent with what you're saying, but the issue people have is that a player cannot possibly judge whether his toenail is offside, so there needs to be a fairer, not exact, way of deciding offside and this falls to the degree of latitude in place between how offside is measured.

For instance, whether it's the back of the head or from the foot furthest forward where the initial measurement takes place, the thickness of the lines gives a particular degree of latitude, for argument's sake, say 25 cm, which is in favour of the striker. Although there would still be some subjectivity in relation to VAR because it didn't place the line right at the back of the head (because a fan perceives there was still a spare millimetre), people wouldn't feel as aggrieved because it's the striker that has the cushion of 25cm.
 
Very underrated and an easy target for some who ought to know better.
He's a grafter and never shirks a tackle or moans when things are not going for him.
Always gives his best and you can't ask for more than that.
Reminds me a bit of Richard Dunne (and I loved Dunnie). Also struggles to sort his feet our sometime as well. But committed, good in the air, decent pace and reads the game well.
 
We mustn't get too giddy with an eight point lead. I seem to recall a team who squandered an eight point lead with a lot less games left to play. Can't for the life of me remember who it was. I think they steadied the leaking ship in the last game with a win at Sunderland, but the damage had been well 'n truly done. I also seem to recall that a Vinny bullet header figured largely in the demise!
You're not wrong about it being too early to get giddy but it's a great feeling nevertheless.
 
Any criticism of Grealish is extremely premature and properly raggy.
Anybody with half a wit should recognise that every player we have signed in recent years (Dias excepted!) has taken at least a season to settle into the system and deliver their best.
Rodri, Gundogan, Mahrez, Bernardo and Cancelo all struggled to start with.
Grealish’s qualities are not in doubt and he will come good when the time is right.
Class is permanent.
All those players you've named got dogs abuse while they were adapting.
Nothing new with Grealish in that sense.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.