aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Google article 51 of the UN convention and the Caroline Test then and info up :)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
British jihadists killed in RAF drone strike
- Thread starter Pam
- Start date
BlueTangerine
Well-Known Member
Google article 51 of the UN convention and the Caroline Test then and info up :)
I meant info as to why the pre-emptive strike was taken. You can justify a lot of actions, I just want to know why these 2 had to die right away.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
I meant info as to why the pre-emptive strike was taken. You can justify a lot of actions, I just want to know why these 2 had to die right away.
The Caroline Test deals with that issue. As for the rest you'll only have to wait 50 years or so to find out. :(
Matty
Well-Known Member
In which country are Christians currently murdering and raping in the name of their religion?
And that's the sole measure of whether or not a religion is peaceful or not? Plus, I think you'll find, the Catholic church has done more than it's fair share of raping.
BlueTangerine
Well-Known Member
The Caroline Test deals with that issue. As for the rest you'll only have to wait 50 years or so to find out. :(
Never heard of it mate. A quick read and it still doesn't help me. It outlines when a pre emptive strike can be taken, but I was more wondering about how bombing 2 blokes miles away meant that an imminent attack couldn't take place. Unless it was an imminent attack against innocent Syrians, but I'm not sure I'd give us that much credit.
They have to give the public something though, or maybe they don't.
Barcon
Well-Known Member
I was racking my brains trying to remember who Armin Tamzerian was, then I remembered he was another drone from sector 7g
Is that French for ****?
hilts
Well-Known Member
I was racking my brains trying to remember who Armin Tamzerian was, then I remembered he was another drone from sector 7g
Oh god he's not back is he?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
No that's Français.Is that French for ****?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Never heard of it mate. A quick read and it still doesn't help me. It outlines when a pre emptive strike can be taken, but I was more wondering about how bombing 2 blokes miles away meant that an imminent attack couldn't take place. Unless it was an imminent attack against innocent Syrians, but I'm not sure I'd give us that much credit.
They have to give the public something though, or maybe they don't.
It just outlines that in specific circumstances the action taken isn't illegal, whether it was right or wrong depends on your viewpoint.
Here's a good article on it by David Allen.
http://blogs.ft.com/david-allen-green/2015/09/08/when-does-the-uk-government-have-licence-to-kill/
Gelsons Dad
Well-Known Member
The problem with referencing 51 or the Caroline Test is that they are irrelevant so long as IS is not a member of the UN. We are not dealing with a state or nation, we are dealing with a terrorist organisation operating across the world.