Brewster's millions
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 3,736
Totally agree about the front-loading of the expenditure, and the strong likelihood that what is being painted as an exceptional increase in departmental spending limits over the next two years simply becomes the norm, requiring more borrowing and tax increases further out. If you look at the real terms RDEL figures, they have increases in excess of 4% for this year and 3% for next, and then just over 1% per annum thereafter, which you would have to say is going to be hard to stick to as an election approaches. And of course the lack of any meaningful growth upgrade from the OBR just compounds the issue, as you say.The problem, as I see it, is the markets have seen an increase of over £140bn in borrowing this Parliament and huge tax rises but with lower growth forecasted compared to before the budget. Now Labour will argue that the growth predictions are wrong but that’s a worry. There are two key concerns here, firstly how much Reeves has front loaded public spending for the first 2 years with austerity in all but name for the remaining 2 years before the next GE - that’s not going to promote growth. More money doesn’t mean more output, we’ve all seen that the NHS has a 17% increase in funding, increases in staffing yet only a 1% increase in output. This is why talk of reform become practical actions is central to this. Secondly how much of this becomes structural leading to more tax rises / increased borrowing without returns on growth - the main problem in her in-tray is she needs to agree multi year department settlements next spring before any of the reform improvements have manifested themselves - it’s a shot in the dark at that point and markets are concerned there isn’t a plan, albeit they can see the making of one. Labour have pinned their flag to the growth mast, so far it doesn’t look encouraging but time will tell.
If this goes tits up then the tories are going to take a flame thrower to this public spending spree. They’ll get blamed for austerity and the whole circus goes again. Anyway fingers crossed is does work - god knows we need it.
A couple of other figures stand out. The first one is how the increase in total government spending is being split between departmental spending and investment; by the end of the forecast horizon, investment only receives 30% of the overall rise in spending, which again plays into this concern about a structural rise in departmental spending and borrowing.
The other is simply the size of the increase in gilt supply penciled-in for next year, especially when you take into account the sale of gilts from the APF and the size of redemptions. Gross issuance including the APF sales is running at about 14% of GDP per annum this year and next. Big numbers.
Last edited: