gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Re: Burglar stabbed to death, Manchester
I'm trying to see if he acknowledges that in some circumstances the force used is unreasonable, because once we have established that those circumstances exist , I fail to see how he, or anyone else can argue against the current system.
The fact is, as I have stated before, a jury is comprised of people like you me and him. We may have differing ideas about what is reasonable but your vote on that jury is as powerful as mine and his. And if there's any doubt that the force was unreasonable then the homeowner gets acquitted in any event. I don't know about you but knowing that makes me feel confident that I can use whatever force is required if someone breaks into my home.
I accept that putting homeowners through this ordeal can be unpleasant but that is the price we all pay for living in a free and open society.<br /><br />-- Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:42 am --<br /><br />
In those circumstances I cannot imagine a jury ever convicting you.
Pigeonho said:Sorry to butt in.gordondaviesmoustache said:wayne71 said:Not working in the legal business or being a criminal I'm no expert but I thought the police investigated crimes and the CPS decided if it went to court?
I'm certainly not part of the 'lynch mob' but I fail to see why some innocent hard working law abiding person should be dragged through the courts because some heroin addled scumbag decides to break in to their property.
Alright then, I refer you to my previous post. Is it ok to torture them for a couple of weeks before killing them?
Torturing them would be premeditated, and would rightly mean that person has then become the criminal. It isn't premeditated to whack someone with whatever is closest as you are confronted with that person carrying the premeditated act of breaking into your home.
If the person hadn't carried out his premeditated act, the home owner would be sound asleep and no-one would be in any harm.
The bottom line is this innocent man is now looking at having his life turned upside down because some thieving little twat didn't bother going down the hard work route to make a life for himself. Thankfully he has paid the price for that. The homeowner should be praised, however he is looking at spending a large amount of his life mixed with the type of person he was trying to protect his home and family from, and that is just 100% wrong.
I'm trying to see if he acknowledges that in some circumstances the force used is unreasonable, because once we have established that those circumstances exist , I fail to see how he, or anyone else can argue against the current system.
The fact is, as I have stated before, a jury is comprised of people like you me and him. We may have differing ideas about what is reasonable but your vote on that jury is as powerful as mine and his. And if there's any doubt that the force was unreasonable then the homeowner gets acquitted in any event. I don't know about you but knowing that makes me feel confident that I can use whatever force is required if someone breaks into my home.
I accept that putting homeowners through this ordeal can be unpleasant but that is the price we all pay for living in a free and open society.<br /><br />-- Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:42 am --<br /><br />
wayne71 said:gordondaviesmoustache said:wayne71 said:Not working in the legal business or being a criminal I'm no expert but I thought the police investigated crimes and the CPS decided if it went to court?
I'm certainly not part of the 'lynch mob' but I fail to see why some innocent hard working law abiding person should be dragged through the courts because some heroin addled scumbag decides to break in to their property.
Alright then, I refer you to my previous post. Is it ok to torture them for a couple of weeks before killing them?
No, that would make you as bad as or worse than them. I am talking about a heat of the moment decision you make to defend your family or property against a balaclava wearing bloke who you found wandering around your house with a crowbar.
In those circumstances I cannot imagine a jury ever convicting you.