MnchstrCityBlues79
Well-Known Member
fredmont said:
This. Barry has been a servant of the club. If Pellegrini is set on not even naming him to the team, let him move on.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Can we afford to let Barry go?
- Thread starter Bobbymanc
- Start date
This. Barry has been a servant of the club. If Pellegrini is set on not even naming him to the team, let him move on.
Berkovic_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 1,266
NO!
Sadly it looks as if he himself wants to go for regular football which you can't really blame him for.
I do fear about what may happen if our current midfield combination comes up against decent opposition. Barry always stepped up in the big games (domestically anyway)
Sadly it looks as if he himself wants to go for regular football which you can't really blame him for.
I do fear about what may happen if our current midfield combination comes up against decent opposition. Barry always stepped up in the big games (domestically anyway)
PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
MnchstrCityBlues79 said:fredmont said:If he's determined not to play him, yes.
This. Barry has been a servant of the club. If Pellegrini is set on not even naming him to the team, let him move on.
If he's going to let him leave, then I hope at least he has his eye on a replacement. If not, letting him go would be a foolish decision.
peterlakie
Member
- Joined
- 26 Apr 2013
- Messages
- 9
He is a really good player, but he does give the ball away too frequently.
I still want to thank him for that 93rd min header to win 1:0 at home to Reading!
I still want to thank him for that 93rd min header to win 1:0 at home to Reading!
MnchstrCityBlues79
Well-Known Member
PhuketBlue said:MnchstrCityBlues79 said:fredmont said:If he's determined not to play him, yes.
This. Barry has been a servant of the club. If Pellegrini is set on not even naming him to the team, let him move on.
If he's going to let him leave, then I hope at least he has his eye on a replacement. If not, letting him go would be a foolish decision.
Also agreed; implied is that good business is done. Unfortunately its difficult to find a prem level replacement that is content to receive time just here and there.
OB1
Well-Known Member
The only strong argument for letting Gaz Baz go is a financial one. From a purely footballing perspective, we should keep him: there will still be plenty of situations where his the value of his experience will outweigh the downside of his slowing legs.
kinkysleftfoot
Well-Known Member
peterlakie said:He is a really good player, but he does give the ball away too frequently.
I still want to thank him for that 93rd min header to win 1:0 at home to Reading!
He very rarely gives it away!! But when he does it seems to be crucial and it stands out
greasedupdeafguy
Well-Known Member
Yes although I would be a bit pissed if its only a loan move to Everton hopefully we can get a small fee for him instead of him leaving for nothing next summer. I can understand why the club wants rid he is on the last year of his contract, won't be getting a new one and will be on extremely high wages. If we continue to play two in the midfield I can't see him getting much game time with Fernandinho, Yaya, Rodwell plus Milner and Garcia.