Can we cut Edin a break?

SWP's back said:
NQCitizen said:
SWP's back said:
Lot's of better CF's than Dzeko:

Cavani
Falcao
Balotelli (plays best when leading the line a la cup semi and final)
Drogba (still)
Ibra
Rooney (when played there as 29 goals attests last season)
Benzema
Gomez
Klose
RVP

And when you've deleted the ones that probably wouldn't count as "poaching target men" (hold up play and fox-in-the-box tap-ins combined) as I said then you've added Drogba and Gomez truly, seeing as I'd already said Cavani and Falcao? Would you consider Rooney a target man? Or Benzema, or Ibra a poacher? They're not players scoring scruffy 3 yarders like a true poacher like Raul are they? That would discount them as poachers in my mind.

Personally I'd have Edin over Drogba or Gomez, most of the time Balo is hanging around nowhere near the goal line, waiting to score wondergoals.

Still even taking that whole list into account it shows the company Edin is in, and he is younger than most of them.

It was interesting to see your list though, sometimes I just don't get who some people on this board thinks is miles better than Dzeko. With our four strikers we are blessed, beyond any other club.
I don't think Edin is a bad player, far from it. As stated, he is the best 4th striker in world football, club or international. And I don't think it is doing him a disservice to say he is not as good as Kun, Tevez or Mario who I would say are all in or around the top 10 strikers/forwards/CF's in the world.

Mario plays the lone striker role very well, he often plays on the left of a 3 for City though to accomodate others. So of course he isn't on the line getting tap ins when playing that role.

-- Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:11 pm --

MSP said:
SWP's back said:
A player is worth as much as anyone is willing to pay for him.

<a class="postlink" href="http://in.news.yahoo.com/man-city-spurns-40-mln-pound-psg-bid-082444569.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://in.news.yahoo.com/man-city-spurn ... 44569.html</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2186921/Manchester-City-reject-40m-Mario-Balotelli-bid-Roberto-Mancini-vowed-quit.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -quit.html</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://msn.foxsports.com/foxsoccer/premierleague/story/paper-chase-aug-11-manchester-city-rejects-psg-offer-for-mario-balotelli-081112" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://msn.foxsports.com/foxsoccer/prem ... lli-081112</a>

If I post some links will that prove City made a bid or shown interest for half players in the World.

'This summer we had a lot of requests for him,' said Mancini.

'Mario did a fantastic European Championship. He's 21, it is clear that he can improve.'

Read more: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2186921/Manchester-City-reject-40m-Mario-Balotelli-bid-Roberto-Mancini-vowed-quit.html#ixzz25aoGiKlK" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... z25aoGiKlK</a>

-- Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:12 pm --

BillyShears said:
Also, from City's perspective, had a 40 million pound offer come in for Mario, we'd have sold him.
You don't know that at all.

I've never told there was no interest for him, I just told I don't believe it's 40m.

You can't prove absolutely anything with those links as I could use links to prove you that we made 120m bid for Ronaldo yesterday.

I know both are bullshit and you keep believing that somebody is moron enough to bid 40m for Balotelli if that makes you feel better.
 
Why would it make me feel better. You have no evidence to the contrary so they'll do for me. Either way and forgetting any figures, they were enquiring after Mario, not Dzeko which was my point (as to which player is "better"). No media were reporting bids over £20m for Edin were they.
 
i've divorced women that argued with me less than swp does


your actually wrong swp and its ok we all are wrong sometimes ...even the best of us..but its good when you are wrong to sometimes not being more wrong by trying to be right)if that makes sense).

your always gonna make excuses and thats a shame, i didnt start this you did ,and you are arguing for the sake of garry barry and mario ..just think about the players you are arguing about...if it was de rossi or tevez i could understand .

we are gonna have to agree to disagree ...but jeez from a man that used talk sense im honestly surprised
 
It's also worth remembering Mario is on record as saying Ibra is his hero and his dream is to play alongside him (albeit at the time he said in the Milan shirt). Were PSG really interested at 40 million pounds, you can bet your life that Mino Raiola would've been all over the papers with it because he will have known he could've squeezed a new contract out of City for Mario on that basis alone. And had we not acquiesced to the new contract, then it would be quite easy for him to argue that Mario was "following his dream" to go play at PSG alongside Ibra.
 
SWP's back said:
Why would it make me feel better. You have no evidence to the contrary so they'll do for me. Either way and forgetting any figures, they were enquiring after Mario, not Dzeko which was my point (as to which player is "better"). No media were reporting bids over £20m for Edin were they.

Lol, I don't give a shit if someone made a bid for Dzeko or not, and how much it was.

You are selectively using media to back your points and I don't. Media reports mean and prove shit at all. There was no a single word about Balotelli this summer until Mancini said there was interest for him. Then we suddenly saw 40m bids. Yeah, sure.

And again, if we're going to take media reports as proof for anything - just tell me and I'll google for some of most bullshitting City bids you could imagine :)
 
cyprustavern said:
i've divorced women that argued with me less than swp does


your actually wrong swp and its ok we all are wrong sometimes ...even the best of us..but its good when you are wrong to sometimes not being more wrong by trying to be right)if that makes sense).

your always gonna make excuses and thats a shame, i didnt start this you did ,and you are arguing for the sake of garry barry and mario ..just think about the players you are arguing about...if it was de rossi or tevez i could understand .

we are gonna have to agree to disagree ...but jeez from a man that used talk sense im honestly surprised
I'm not wrong which is why you keep just saying it and not rebutting my points.<br /><br />-- Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:28 pm --<br /><br />
BillyShears said:
It's also worth remembering Mario is on record as saying Ibra is his hero and his dream is to play alongside him (albeit at the time he said in the Milan shirt). Were PSG really interested at 40 million pounds, you can bet your life that Mino Raiola would've been all over the papers with it because he will have known he could've squeezed a new contract out of City for Mario on that basis alone. And had we not acquiesced to the new contract, then it would be quite easy for him to argue that Mario was "following his dream" to go play at PSG alongside Ibra.
They bought Ibra after we turned down there offer.

You said yourself that they enquired and were told no. The figures involved don't matter, the same argument could be used had it been a £20m, £30m or £40m bid (ie Riola)
 
SWP's back said:
cyprustavern said:
i've divorced women that argued with me less than swp does


your actually wrong swp and its ok we all are wrong sometimes ...even the best of us..but its good when you are wrong to sometimes not being more wrong by trying to be right)if that makes sense).

your always gonna make excuses and thats a shame, i didnt start this you did ,and you are arguing for the sake of garry barry and mario ..just think about the players you are arguing about...if it was de rossi or tevez i could understand .

we are gonna have to agree to disagree ...but jeez from a man that used talk sense im honestly surprised
I'm not wrong which is why you keep just saying it and not rebutting my points.

You have no points whatsoever, you're just trying to make them from nothing.

PS, lol, thought you quoted me here but let it stand :)
 
SWP's back said:
They bought Ibra after we turned down there offer.

You said yourself that they enquired and were told no. The figures involved don't matter, the same argument could be used had it been a £20m, £30m or £40m bid (ie Riola)

I disagree. An enquiry is just an enquiry. If PSG had been serious they'd have given Mino an idea of what kind of contract Mario would have received, and he would've used that to get a better contract out of us. He is the single most hard nosed agent out there right now. Even a hint of a better deal, and he'd have been in like a shot. He wasn't which goes some way IMO to showing that PSG (along with AC and Inter) had no serious intention of going anywhere near Mario.
 
MSP said:
SWP's back said:
Why would it make me feel better. You have no evidence to the contrary so they'll do for me. Either way and forgetting any figures, they were enquiring after Mario, not Dzeko which was my point (as to which player is "better"). No media were reporting bids over £20m for Edin were they.

Lol, I don't give a shit if someone made a bid for Dzeko or not, and how much it was.

You are selectively using media to back your points and I don't. Media reports mean and prove shit at all. There was no a single word about Balotelli this summer until Mancini said there was interest for him. Then we suddenly saw 40m bids. Yeah, sure.

And again, if we're going to take media reports as proof for anything - just tell me and I'll google for some of most bullshitting City bids you could imagine :)
Again you miss the point. I mention the PSG bid showing that other clubs are more interested in Mario than Dzeko. That it's not just Mancini that thinks Mario is better.
 
SWP's back said:
MSP said:
SWP's back said:
Why would it make me feel better. You have no evidence to the contrary so they'll do for me. Either way and forgetting any figures, they were enquiring after Mario, not Dzeko which was my point (as to which player is "better"). No media were reporting bids over £20m for Edin were they.

Lol, I don't give a shit if someone made a bid for Dzeko or not, and how much it was.

You are selectively using media to back your points and I don't. Media reports mean and prove shit at all. There was no a single word about Balotelli this summer until Mancini said there was interest for him. Then we suddenly saw 40m bids. Yeah, sure.

And again, if we're going to take media reports as proof for anything - just tell me and I'll google for some of most bullshitting City bids you could imagine :)
Again you miss the point. I mention the PSG bid showing that other clubs are more interested in Mario than Dzeko. That it's not just Mancini that thinks Mario is better.


you are wronger than a wrong un ...but by god i admire your fighting spirit...rebutting your wrong points /? that would just be silly of me
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.