Carol Thatcher and the racist remark

johnmc said:
Just like saying the guy looks like a thumb to me. If he looks like something or someone to you then he does. If someone looked like hitler would it be wrong to say it?

If he was Jewish, then almost certainly. Does this help?
 
1361165030_95f476c298.jpg


Right, let's have an end to all this pc nonsense. Happy Now?
 
johnmc said:
So the origins are not racist at all. Similar to the swastica (sp) in that it has been taken on by certain people to mean offensive things.

As I remember, the Hindu symbol [I do not know much about it, apologies to Hindus] was inverted by the Nazis. Again, others will know more about this than me but I understand that it is therefore technically incorrect to refer to the Third Reich symbol as a swastika [pedant that I am].
 
I think everyone's getting off the subject talking about the n word, well my mates black and someone who's pissed wanting to kill asian kids in oldham! The topic was carol thatcher using the word Gollywog about a black tennis player... if the player was Monfils, i don't think it was racist at all. I am not a fan of the completely morally corrupt Thatcher family and if she had been talking about a black man who hadn't the slightest characteristics of a gollywog i would say it was meant to be a racist remark. I don't think she should've lost her job and i do believe it is an example of the BBC's political correctness gone mad.
 
johnmc said:
coleridge said:
If he was Jewish, then almost certainly. Does this help?

Right so, if a person looks like hitler I can say this unless this person is jewish in which case I can't? Bollocks
My niece, inexplicably, says I look like Will Smith and/or Don Cheadle. Bearing in mind I'm a short white guy whose ears don't stick out I'm not sure I agree with her!!!

On issue, to compare a black man to a cartoon representation of a black man that was used to mock blacks is stupidity incarnate. The fact Carol Thatcher's PR 'guru' is suggesting the BBC should apologise to HER is laughable.
 
coleridge said:
johnmc said:
So the origins are not racist at all. Similar to the swastica (sp) in that it has been taken on by certain people to mean offensive things.

As I remember, the Hindu symbol [I do not know much about it, apologies to Hindus] was inverted by the Nazis. Again, others will know more about this than me but I understand that it is therefore technically incorrect to refer to the Third Reich symbol as a swastika [pedant that I am].

Its the same - hitler looked to incorporate the swastika in to a flag with the 3 colours used in the old german flag of red balck and white (wiki)
 
johnmc said:
coleridge said:
If he was Jewish, then almost certainly. Does this help?

Right so, if a person looks like hitler I can say this unless this person is jewish in which case I can't? Bollocks

I was suggesting an analogy. What kind of argument is 'Bollocks' and how is one supposed to respond to it?
 
I think concerning the topic at hand, she may have made a somewhat accurate comparison, technically speaking, but it just shows how stupid, and/or out of touch with society, she is.

It's harsh to lose her job is it was an innocent comment.... but, not being her, we just wont know whether it was or not.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.