It's not bizarre at all, it's a perfectly logical conclusion to arrive at. She was sat in the back of the car and (I would say) obscured from his view. In any event, it was clear from the footage that the discharge was aimed at her father, the driver. So in answer to your question, I would say he intended to hit (shower) the girl's father.Im sorry. That's utterly bizarre. What do you think he intended to do then if not shower a girl with spit?.....
You've obviously never been to Hyde then.
Most probably yeah.You have me on that, surely the lamping would happen though?
As I said. I am on holiday. Don’t want to waste 1 second of it listening to their fucking horrible voice. Hate them with a passion and I don’t hide it. If that makes me less intelligent I cam live with thatIt would have been quicker to post “I have the intelligence of a gnat”.
Why is that mate?100% didn't happen.
Why is that mate?
Somebody will only lamp someone if they they are sure they are not going to get hammered. So in this instance I am sure he wasn’t sureYou have me on that, surely the lamping would happen though?
Somebody will only lamp someone if they they are sure they are not going to get hammered. So in this instance I am sure he wasn’t sure
Im sorry. That's utterly bizarre. What do you think he intended to do then if not shower a girl with spit?.....
I think you need to get your eyes tested. The footage clearly shows the girl in the front passenger seat of the car.It's not bizarre at all, it's a perfectly logical conclusion to arrive at. She was sat in the back of the car and (I would say) obscured from his view. In any event, it was clear from the footage that the discharge was aimed at her father, the driver. So in answer to your question, I would say he intended to hit (shower) the girl's father.
Have you not seen the footage?