abu13
Well-Known Member
Yep, they would have it believed that we have driven them into debt to compete with us.But we're the bad guys, wahh haaa haa. Fuck me.
Yep, they would have it believed that we have driven them into debt to compete with us.But we're the bad guys, wahh haaa haa. Fuck me.
Have you seen the report?Not anymore according to the Deloitte report published above, although the new American owner will probably correct that soon - Leicester City the 4th club with zero debt
They love to talk about Coutinho money but never the 35 million they spent on Andy CarrollI was sure the Coutinho money covered Liverpool's debt..?
Was just going off the tweet above referencing DeloittesHave you seen the report?
Leicester are supposed to have around £70m in debt according to Forbes, Arsenals debt to value of the club is only 1% most are pretty low but Spurs are 45%.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoz...worth-51-billion-back-on-top/?sh=7f441e15286b
Leicester have a £70m bank loan on their books plus they owe £180m to other group companies.Have you seen the report?
Leicester are supposed to have around £70m in debt according to Forbes, Arsenals debt to value of the club is only 1% most are pretty low but Spurs are 45%.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoz...worth-51-billion-back-on-top/?sh=7f441e15286b
€565m according to the Forbes one which is very broad brush but supposed to be May 2022. I thought the twitter thing was questionable.Those figures look wrong as united's debt is much higher than €420m. More like €650m.
They've also took out an 150m loan for transfers.Tottenham being 3rd is by far the funniest thing I've seen all day
£565m more like. I think Deloitte must have used net debt, an entirely pointless figure.€565m according to the Forbes one which is very broad brush but supposed to be May 2022. I thought the twitter thing was questionable.