CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[Colin Bells Boots]

Dishes it out but can't take it. Has he never seen all the dipper tweets wishing death on people?

Soft ****.

Well let's hope that changes for his next visit, the utter mardarse cnut !

 

[LevyBee76]

What a stressful but now hilarious morning this turned out to be, and Teba(g)s statement just puts the icing on the cake

 

[mccity]

Who is that cock garage?

He's the Der Spiegel writer I think.

 

[BringBackSwales]

Danny Mills stabbed City in the back throughout his time as a player. I can't go into details on here but let's just leave it at: "He is a total snake."

Yes please go into details. The turd robbed us of £35k a week when we didn’t have a pot to piss in. Surely the most all time hated City player

 

[Tricky_Trev]

Those quotes from Tebas only serve to hammer home how personal this has been from the very beginning. CAS are impartial, he doesn’t like the truth so wants someone else to be the arbiter of truth instead. It was a cartel-led witch hunt, nothing more nothing less.

 

[M18CTID]

Yep, terrific job gents. I can only imagine how much work and research you all did. Hugely appreciated by everyone.

Also, well done to all those Blues who kept the faith as well, whilst, erm, some of us thought we’d lose. Thank you for your positivity throughout. I’ll have to give it a try some time.....

Alls well that ends well - sorry I had a pop the other week....you negative fucker!

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

City to Uefa, "That £8m fine? Just take it from our £150m prize money this season. You can put it in your Cup when we have finished pissing in it."

 

[DrBlueBob]

To be fair it only comes in Nescafe boxes. ;)

Oh, the other two have their own civets.

 

[creed]

So I don't want to get caught up in conspiracy chat, but I will say this case has really thrown up some mega problems in contemporary sports journalism. It was always a highly specific and complex case, and almost every major paper has been reporting on it based on feelings rather than a technical understanding of the accusations and responses. I don't think I've once seen someone say 'they're being prosecuted for something they've already been punished for, and the evidence that this should be retried is very, very light'.

Without derailing such a joyous thread (this might be one for the media thread), I agree and think it's a stark example of a wider trend in journalism.

Where once we had news (in its widest sense), now we have views. There's gotta be views in match reports because they must be subjective to avoid being a rolling transcript of who did what, and of course opinion pieces. But there's been so much opinion stuff masquerading as news reporting that it demeans what should be a noble craft.

So yeah. And FWIW, here's a subjective hot take, but anyone else getting the vibe from the UEFA statement that the wider (parent) organisation is "noting" the failings of its panels so it can start cleaning house? I know that's been speculated a lot on here over the last few months. Just found that wording interesting. But maybe I'm totally wrong.

 

[Vic]

Who was our lawyer ? He deserves applause.

We signed up all the best lawyers in the field. It left UEFA with some hack lawyer from Grubit, Grubit and Screw.