CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[Nails]

Miguel putting out his own personal balanced rhetoric again.

Even if there were 150 allegations time-barred and 1 not time-barred, they remain ALLEGATIONS and none have been proven.

Nothing more, nothing less.

The fine was because City didn't want to engage with what was effectively a Kangaroo Court.


And Tebas???

Messi soon to become one season closer to retirement, when his Golden Goose finally leaves Barca with an almighty hole to fill...TICK TOCK senor.

Er, isn’t he a Madrid fan? He also hates Catalans.

 

[BlueAnorak]

Come on Southampton
I hope they don’t roll over for those raggy bastards tonight

Leicester have clearly given up so it looks like the raggies will qualify

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

No. Art 56 is a clause of FFP. We breached it. Hence anyone saying we breached FFP is technically correct and therefore no claim for defamation can subsist!!

Bugger !

Let's hope he fucks up with his next effort.

 

[teddykgb]

If we are making gifs we really need Adebayor sliding to the Gunner fans with a few heads replaced

 

[Deleted member 77198]

Sky Sports,

What about the Premier League investigation into Manchester City?
As well as the UEFA investigation, Manchester City are also being investigated by the Premier League over financial issues, academy recruitment and third-party ownership.

That Premier League investigation - which has been running since March 2019 - remains ongoing

I did'nt know we were under investigation for 3rd party ownership?

We aren’t.

 

[Nebuchadnezzar]

Javier, you look so lonesome...

 

[SebastianBlue]

No. Art 56 is a clause of FFP. We breached it. Hence anyone saying we breached FFP is technically correct and therefore no claim for defamation can subsist!!

Beat me to pointing this out.

There is a reason most of these ****s are wording their drivel response in the same manner.

 

[KS55]

That's right. Here's an analogy.

You've been accused of a crime (let's say you're a football writer and have been accused of writing something factually incorrect about a football club) and you say you didn't do it. The police arrest you, investigate you, sentence you and send you to jail (because in this universe they can do that). Luckily you are allowed to appeal because you have evidence that you didn't write what they said you did and also the appeal courts exist in a universe where common sense prevails.

You're appealing the sentence (and or investigation), not the law for the crime you are accused of breaking. You agree with the law.

Why this isn't getting through to people is beyond me.

People believe what they want to believe.

 

[Shads]

Not all our costs because if our appeal was against the non-co-operation charge as well as the main charge, we lost that part. I think they will be apportioned as the Court thinks fit.

I think We always accepted that we had not fully co-operated with UEFA. It was a clear and deliberate tactical decision. We were not banned for failing to cooperate. We were banned for breaching FFP financial rules. We were exonerated from that entirely. Hence prevailing party. If the only element of fault found by Uefa was a lack of cooperation we would not have even pursued a claim to CAS.

 

[Carlos- the- jackal]

This is just glorious, the drooling imbeciles, uneducated masses and divs of the highest are all foaming at the mouth, isn’t karma great you know nowt fuckwits!