No. Art 56 is a clause of FFP. We breached it. Hence anyone saying we breached FFP is technically correct and therefore no claim for defamation can subsist!!
Ok but we can still kick his fcukin head in ;)
No. Art 56 is a clause of FFP. We breached it. Hence anyone saying we breached FFP is technically correct and therefore no claim for defamation can subsist!!
I blame Cher.People believe what they want to believe.
Miguel putting out his own personal balanced rhetoric again.
Even if there were 150 allegations time-barred and 1 not time-barred, they remain ALLEGATIONS and none have been proven.
Nothing more, nothing less.
The fine was because City didn't want to engage with what was effectively a Kangaroo Court.
And Tebas???
Messi soon to become one season closer to retirement, when his Golden Goose finally leaves Barca with an almighty hole to fill...TICK TOCK senor.
It was his boss not himFor those who don't already know, our lead lawyer was Lord David Pannick. I suppose the moral is: if you are in trouble - Pannick!
Other clubs and journos should shut the fuck up.
CAS has a solid reputation as an impartial adjudicator.
Anyone saying that we got away with it because of our wealth is questioning the integrity of CAS.
The latest google reviews of CAS are brilliant!
BBC NW with an ambiguously worded report.
City might want to play it cool but some individuals and some media might need a legal shot across the bows.