No way. City clearly prevailing party. There would have been no Appeal to CAS for a ruling of none cooperation and a fine. The ban is why we appealed and it was overturned. Therefore we prevailed.Who is awarded costs is not always divulged, the paragraph dealing with that was redacted in the first CAS appeal document. I would have thought as there were two charges and one was cleared a 50-50 split wouldn't be out of the question?
Don't have an account?Register now!