CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

On a simple point of information post, if CAS thought it was 'inappropriate' for UEFA to ban a team for failing to 'cooperate' (a euphemism if ever there were one for supplying yer prosecutor with yer own evidence of conformity!) why did Uefa try to stick it on us?

 

[cheekybids]

It can also be used to say one is leaving, eg "We're losing 6-1 at home, let's do one".

I had visions of the Rag in the leather jacket lifting his colours & saying this.

 

[Rammy Blue]

I missed out a few bullet points from at the end, so it’s not complete, lol.

I’ll delete the post in 10 mins.

;-)

 

[Rammy Blue]

Nice one, that worked a treat.

You can sign up for free and get a couple of free articles every day or week, can’t remember which. I must have done it some time in the past for a different City article.

 

[PannickAtTheDisco]

you mean the article will be time-barred after 10 minutes? How convenient.

 

[Ardwick Green Blue]

Wasn’t there some nifty trick to get past a paywall?

For future reference - see my Bypass Paywalls thread in Off Topic. The mods don't like articles being copy & pasted due to copyright issues.

 

[jaseirai]

If anyone is lazy
https://github.com/iamadamdev/bypass-paywalls-chrome
Couldnt get chrome mobile to work but firefox does

 

[blueparrot]

Nice one, that worked a treat.

Still there in your quote though.

 

[fulabeer]

It can also be used to say one is leaving, eg "We're losing 6-1 at home, let's do one".

I seem to remember from my Gorton days that the saying originates from leaving a curry house without paying. (but i could be wrong!)
The discussion would be "are we doing a runner/are we doing one?", ie a disappearing act.
The signal would then be "Do one!"
This then transformed into a saying (when you want somebody to leave/go/disappear), you would say "do one mate".

Trouble is i never had the balls to do a runner. So i always ended up paying the whole bill!

 

[City_Sean]

Is there anything in the CAS judgement which could open us up to punishment from the PL? Or does the fact that the CAS release say that City "did not disguise equity funding as state contributions" mean we're in the clear?