kaz7
Well-Known Member
MCFC ruining courts since 2020MCFC, Champions of Innocence 2020
MCFC ruining courts since 2020MCFC, Champions of Innocence 2020
You're giving him the benefit of the doubt as he stated it in terms in which you could consider he was being either anti UEFA and anti decision whereas its being portrayed on SKY as exactly what I suspect which is that weve been fined so we must be guilty. His previous musings on the subject of our charge heavily intimate he meant the latter.
We need a body language expert. Calling @ricky77 ;-)
As I said, the outlets were always going to interpret this way.and @SebastianBlue
Here we go. Obviously a lot of creative interpretation in that, not denying that.
But He knew what he was doing though, and how it would echo round when he said it, without needing to put hinself on the line for saying it. He deserves credit fir that, it is a skill.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...n-Manchester-Citys-two-year-European-ban.html
I dare bet other papers will run with a similar take on it.
As I said, the outlets were always going to interpret this way.
He could have said “I think City deserve this!” and the media would have reported “Mourinho says City deserve to be called cheats and a ‘grubby club’!” ;-)
Take a bow, son.What it boils down to is that we've been found "not guilty" of murder, but the court fined us £50 for being rude to a policeman who was trying to fit us up.
As I said, the outlets were always going to interpret this way.
He could have said “I think City deserve this!” and the media would have reported “Mourinho says City deserve to be called cheats and a ‘grubby club’!”
I am sure many will find a way to twist Arteta’s very supportive comments to be a passive-aggressive takedown of his former boss. ;-)
Fair enough. I think we agree he could have been meaning to do it, we just disagree on whether he actually consciously meant to do so, and I don’t think we’ll ever really know.Not denying for a second churnalists would have looked for that angle. What i'm claiming is he 100% gave it to them. Without seeming to do so. Watching that video, nothing can convince me he didn't mean to do exactly that, and insinuate it, enough to make it stick.