And you think the respondent's actually read the 85 page report and digested it.
Think that's the point blue!
And you think the respondent's actually read the 85 page report and digested it.
shouldn't be too hard on him...he lost his marbles a few years ago...this should send him back over the edge....Rob Harris will be next.....
The rules are in black and white.
Its not odd when the hacks are desperately twisting to keep their credibility.
Ha.
I realise in hindsight that City are the Appellant, and UEFA are the Respondent. It should have been UEFA nomianating.
Would have thought Samuel would have a piece to copy by now.... he is very quiet for something as big as this
Err I made the same assumption.
Oops.
That'll teach you to listen to me!
What we gained is, we got it away from the AC and what was obviously a kangaroo court in UEFA.Why did we do it and what have we gained by doing it?
All I can see is a very substantial fine, censure by CAS for not co-operating and an open goal for the media to infer we were hiding evidence.
He is probably doing what the others are not and reading it allWould have thought Samuel would have a piece to copy by now.... he is very quiet for something as big as this