CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Blueknows said:
Ogden pleading innocence
Click to expand...

For being so evidently self-unaware that they are a danger to both themselves and society, hence we wouldn't want them anywhere near large gatherings of people, steep staircases or, heaven forbid, a combination of the two such as might be found regularly at the Etihad.
 
It strikes me that perhaps the most useful purpose of this judgment is that the club's enemies are openly unmasking themselves for the world to see.

You can no longer claim any shred of impartiality when your coverage of it is wholly focused upon City's holding back of evidence from UEFA (based on advice from their own legal team). This same evidence was later presented to CAS and directly used to exonerate the club which they obviously omit in their articles so it's abundantly clear they have an agenda.

We all know who they are, most of them are probably so self-absorbed they don't even realise the extent they have exposed themselves in their reactions to the judgment of CAS (an independent court it's worth repeating). Their strategy will fail sooner rather than later they are treading a dangerously thin line now.
 
Shirley said:
Seen that before but now they are winning trophies and with a fan base on par with rags the hordes from Scandinavia and Ireland will pay through the nose for a ticket.
Click to expand...

Their attendances are still below City's. City's average attendances in 2019-20 before lockdown averaged 54,391 while Liverpool's were 53,116. Yet City are taunted by the dipperati for having empty seats.

https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/premier-league/attendances
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.