Cesc Fabregas signs for Chelsea (page 190)

Re: Cesc Fabregas

Andouble said:
one of the few players in the world who is good enough AND home grown. Since Lescott, Barry, Milner, Richards all gone, big 'yes' for me.


I'd much rather we go for someone like Barkley or especially Shaw if home grown is the criteria.


I'd take Hazard all day long over Wet Fibreglass
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

From what i remember of him at Arsenal, he has been asked to play a different role at Barca

I've always said his style of play suits the premier league, going over to Spain and playing their pass pass way isn't his game IMO

The lad was playing in the premier league since he was 17, he was brought up on the English game, i think he would be a superb signing for any PL team

It's not a case of is he better than Yaya, ill have both if possible. It's a case of him being a great signing for 30+ million, we can make room for him by selling Garcia, Milner and Rodwell and bringing in Fabregas and Fernando
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

LoveCity said:
Everyone's productivity is good at Barca, because even when they have an average season they score 100 goals. Ibra had good stats for Barca too, but was far from a glowing success. Indeed, if Fabregas had been so good, why are Barcelona so desperate to sell a player in his prime years after going to such lengths to sign him back? Especially with Xavi pretty much finished, too. He's had his moments in the last 3 years for sure, but by and large has been a disappointment. Even under Pep.

He is what I consider to be a class stats padder, or has been recently. He'll help bury relegation fodder then do absolutely squat in El Clasico or against Atletico. If you look at him on paper, he looks amazing. If you watch him every week all season, he flatters to deceive. I watch every Barca/Real game, it's been a habit of mine in the last few years, and Fabregas has been really, really average. He was subbed off in 7 of Barcelona's 8 biggest games this season after doing nothing. There was all the talk of his "Barcelona DNA", but he has just as much "Arsenal DNA" with a weak big match mentality. People criticise Nasri for this, but at least Nasri stepped up in a few big games. Fabregas didn't in even one this season, he was a passenger (another reason I struggle to see Chelsea signing him, Mourinho wants everyone alive for 90 minutes).

On no level has can I see how he has been better than Yaya Toure recently. Last season, Yaya Toure was the perfect example of a great Premier League footballer. Not only that, Yaya has years of chemistry and experience in this City team now and functions as the heartbeat. Everything goes through him, he's the best passer of the ball in the Premier League, and to replace him without planning would sort of upset the balance and fluency this team has built.

The grass isn't always greener...

I'd have Koke over Fabregas all day long. A stunning player not living on reputation and strongly rumoured to be the midfielder Barca most want this summer. To me, this news we don't want Fabregas, if true, is like music to my ears. It'd be something of a Torres signing, IMO, buying more on reputation than performance, when there are young, hungry players out there (like Koke or Pogba) who would be more exciting signings.

Again, for me that is far too one sided an analysis. I also watch a hell of a lot of Barcelona and have done for years. I've seen Fabregas be Barca's best player on countless occasions and seen him come off the bench to change the dynamic of a match for them on countless occasions. You say he did nothing in the "big" games for Barca. In La Liga there's only two, Athletico and Real - and in the season just gone both teams were much better teams than Barca. So his lack of impact on those games is a reflection of the lack of impact their whole team had.

You say that he's a stats padder, but those stats are important. When you're averaging double figures for assists and goals almost throughout your entire career I'm not sure how this can be dismissed in the manner in which you seem to be doing. I can't think of many players who across two of the top leagues in the world, over a decade of football, have consistently produced numbers like that from midfield. Certainly Silva, Toure, Nasri, and co don't come close to having numbers like that.

I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree on most of this as for me last season was an anomaly for Toure. He's never ever produced a goals/assists ratio like that previous to last season whereas Fabregas has been doing it every season as I say for most of his career.

Moving forward the reality is also that at 31 and being unsettled, Toure isn't someone we can rely on over the long term. One of the biggest mistakes both Chelsea and United have made in the last five years is allowing their better players to get to the top of the hill and then begin their decline before moving to replace them and evolve the squad. We can't end up in a situation where we wait until the decline in Toure is obvious before moving to bring in another player.

On Koke ... I agree wholeheartedly that he's a truly top player. In the thread started a while back asking who should replace Yaya, he was the name I posted. However Athletico will sell him for stupid stupid money, and even that will not be until he wants the move, which from what I can see of him won't be for a year or two yet.

If it turns out we're not in for Fabregas, and intend to go into the season with a midfield of Toure/Fernandinho/Fernando/Garcia, then I for one think we'll be as far off winning the CL as we were in the season just gone. Those four players do not possess the characteristics required IMO to play the way Pellegrini wants against top opposition like Madrid/Bayern and win the CL.
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

IF Fabregas joins us, we would have to sell a striker.
Also, if we'll sell Kolarov as part of the deal for Benatia, we should go for Shaw not for Fabregas, who btw isn't as great IMO. I'll prefer for Kolarov to stay. He has the best crosses out there.
IN:
FERNANDO
BENATIA
SAGNA
SHAW
NEW GK(an english one, I'm sure someone posted here about someone, forgot his name)

OUT:
MILNER
KOLAROV
RICHARDS
LESCOTT
BARRY
SINCLAIR
RODWELL
PANTY
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

Guillem Balague @GuillemBalague · 6m
1. He has not agreed anything with Chelsea. His agent did not meet Wenger lately (havent spoken for a month)

Guillem Balague @GuillemBalague · 5m
2. Barcelona have told Cesc he has to find a team. They want the money to buy Koke. Cost: 35m euros

Guillem Balague @GuillemBalague · 5m
3. Arsenal dont want Cesc back and he has been told that already by Arsenal

Guillem Balague @GuillemBalague · 4m
4. He is being pushed out by Barcelona but will take his time to find the right club for him'
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

BillyShears said:
LoveCity said:
Everyone's productivity is good at Barca, because even when they have an average season they score 100 goals. Ibra had good stats for Barca too, but was far from a glowing success. Indeed, if Fabregas had been so good, why are Barcelona so desperate to sell a player in his prime years after going to such lengths to sign him back? Especially with Xavi pretty much finished, too. He's had his moments in the last 3 years for sure, but by and large has been a disappointment. Even under Pep.

He is what I consider to be a class stats padder, or has been recently. He'll help bury relegation fodder then do absolutely squat in El Clasico or against Atletico. If you look at him on paper, he looks amazing. If you watch him every week all season, he flatters to deceive. I watch every Barca/Real game, it's been a habit of mine in the last few years, and Fabregas has been really, really average. He was subbed off in 7 of Barcelona's 8 biggest games this season after doing nothing. There was all the talk of his "Barcelona DNA", but he has just as much "Arsenal DNA" with a weak big match mentality. People criticise Nasri for this, but at least Nasri stepped up in a few big games. Fabregas didn't in even one this season, he was a passenger (another reason I struggle to see Chelsea signing him, Mourinho wants everyone alive for 90 minutes).

On no level has can I see how he has been better than Yaya Toure recently. Last season, Yaya Toure was the perfect example of a great Premier League footballer. Not only that, Yaya has years of chemistry and experience in this City team now and functions as the heartbeat. Everything goes through him, he's the best passer of the ball in the Premier League, and to replace him without planning would sort of upset the balance and fluency this team has built.

The grass isn't always greener...

I'd have Koke over Fabregas all day long. A stunning player not living on reputation and strongly rumoured to be the midfielder Barca most want this summer. To me, this news we don't want Fabregas, if true, is like music to my ears. It'd be something of a Torres signing, IMO, buying more on reputation than performance, when there are young, hungry players out there (like Koke or Pogba) who would be more exciting signings.

Again, for me that is far too one sided an analysis. I also watch a hell of a lot of Barcelona and have done for years. I've seen Fabregas be Barca's best player on countless occasions and seen him come off the bench to change the dynamic of a match for them on countless occasions. You say he did nothing in the "big" games for Barca. In La Liga there's only two, Athletico and Real - and in the season just gone both teams were much better teams than Barca. So his lack of impact on those games is a reflection of the lack of impact their whole team had.

You say that he's a stats padder, but those stats are important. When you're averaging double figures for assists and goals almost throughout your entire career I'm not sure how this can be dismissed in the manner in which you seem to be doing. I can't think of many players who across two of the top leagues in the world, over a decade of football, have consistently produced numbers like that from midfield. Certainly Silva, Toure, Nasri, and co don't come close to having numbers like that.

I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree on most of this as for me last season was an anomaly for Toure. He's never ever produced a goals/assists ratio like that previous to last season whereas Fabregas has been doing it every season as I say for most of his career.

Moving forward the reality is also that at 31 and being unsettled, Toure isn't someone we can rely on over the long term. One of the biggest mistakes both Chelsea and United have made in the last five years is allowing their better players to get to the top of the hill and then begin their decline before moving to replace them and evolve the squad. We can't end up in a situation where we wait until the decline in Toure is obvious before moving to bring in another player.

On Koke ... I agree wholeheartedly that he's a truly top player. In the thread started a while back asking who should replace Yaya, he was the name I posted. However Athletico will sell him for stupid stupid money, and even that will not be until he wants the move, which from what I can see of him won't be for a year or two yet.

If it turns out we're not in for Fabregas, and intend to go into the season with a midfield of Toure/Fernandinho/Fernando/Garcia, then I for one think we'll be as far off winning the CL as we were in the season just gone. Those four players do not possess the characteristics required IMO to play the way Pellegrini wants against top opposition like Madrid/Bayern and win the CL.


I can't claim to watch Barca as much as either of you two- so I can't put forward an argument as compelling as to what you two can one way or the other.

I do watch enough football to know he is a very good player though.

He plays football in a way that we want to play football. What also can't be forgotten is the ability of Pelligrini to get the most out of almost all of his players. It would also enable us to add a homegrown player to the squad, and, to sell Toure when his value is high without too much worry.

If there is truth in what Toure's agent has said, which there obviously is, then it is highly unlikely he will be that productive again. He probably wouldn't be that productive again anyway!!

I would perhaps be more interested long term in someone like Pogba, but as far as I can see Fabregas is a phenomonal player; him and fernando would allow us to change our system slightly in order to deal with the loss of Yaya.

I am staggered people are turning their noses up at him.
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

Of course if we sell some players like Guidetti, Sinclair, Rodwell and even a striker ( Which is stupid), then buys a cheaper defender (i mean less then 25m+) like Garay then we can afford Fabregas but i cannot see this deal come through unless Yaya or Aguero leaves, which they are not.
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

He's an amazing player. He's also experienced and proven in this league, the CL and counts as homegrown. If we don't sign him and one of our main rivals do we'll regret it as much as when Utd got van Persie.

Given that he's available relatively cheaply considering his age and ability, and the homegrown factor, then if we're not actively trying to sign him then it's a big mistake by Txiki and co.
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

jimharri said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Sorry to make a childish and thread-derailing point, but neutrals calling fabregas 'cesc' irritates me far more than it should.
Why? I'm struggling to remember a time when he wasn't referred to as Cesc, by either the media or football fans generally. I didn't even know his ''proper'' name; I thought it was Francesco. Googled it to find out it's actually Francesc.

It's the familiar use of "cesc" on its own which has always irritated me. Like he's some kind of tv chef or something who only needs one name.

Like all things which get under a man's skin, I can't properly explain it.

Maybe opposition fans feel the same about Ya Ya, because he's he only other footballer I can think of who gets this over-familiarity/ elevation to single-name cult status. I reckon the Beatles started it.
 
Re: Cesc Fabregas

It's a hard call to make. If it was a choice between Toure and Fabregas you would have to go for Toure. If he isn't wanted by Barcelona then we shouldn't be interested. There are arguments to be made that Toure has had a one off season. I disagree. I think he will continue to play as well as he did this season and if we do move away from the 4-4-2 he may be utilised more in an attacking sense. His power and pace are unmatched anywhere else. He gives us a different option and single handedly manages to drag us through games at times. Fabregas is younger, his stats prove how consistently good he is but he seems to have fallen a little flat in the past couple of years. He won games for Arsenal on his own but he wouldn't pick the game up by the scruff of the neck like Toure does.

If only Yaya could change his attitude and play with the same intensity all game, then he would probably be the best in the world. He is rarely injured and replacing him with Fabregas isn't the right option. We should be looking for younger players to come through and replace him in the next couple of seasons. His wages alone when he retires will mean we can fork out on a decent option. Koke is a better player, Pogba a more like for like replacement to Yaya. We should be looking for younger and better players than Fabregas. Silva can play Fabregas' role equally well.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.