So basically it's this - any error on behalf of City is no evidence against a conspiracy against City, either knowingly or as a result of subconscious bias.
Well then, if that's your premise, your position is unassailable.
But really...
Why not take an unbiased view?
Actually tally up questionable calls for/against City over, say the last 5 years. Do the same for other sides.
Does the plus/minus for City lie beyond 3 or 4 standard deviations from what be expected by pure chance?
If so, you've got a great, scientific argument that you're in the right.
Meanwhile, you've got no basis whatsoever.
You've offered no insight/supporting evidence yourself that things do even out like for like and you're asking me to go back 5 years to do so? What are you talking about?
Also no... lets do season by season as circumstances change, not every season plays out the same and we know this, another error in your assessment there.
I already addressed all your "counter" points before you posted, there are glaring differences you've failed to acknowledge. The biggest one being a Watford is not the same as a Spurs or Chelsea lets not pretend that's the case so we can set our minds at rest(maybe you are happy that way but don't simply imply people are idiots for thinking otherwise... some of us have put some thought into it and not gone tinhat overboard). Is it really better to fool ourselves that we are sure it's impossible that refs(if not bent which is the extreme) could be possibly influenced by anti city agendas at times?
Do I need to remind you of all the wrong calls that were not defensible that went against us last season?
Like Walker being on the wrong side of Raheem who was through on goal electing to shove him in the back as he's lining up a shot? If not the ref then the linesman had to have seen that coming before he even did it and been ready for it.
Like Luiz body checking Aguero off balance who took a tumble as he was about to get in behind the defence with the ball? Common sense should have told the ref Aguero had no reason to go down, all that was left was a sprint with the ball into the penalty area and a goalscoring opportunity.
The Arsenal one is perhaps defensible(less so than the examples I gave in the post that went our way still) if you buy his excuse which I don't(handball Monreal, unnatural hand movement towards the ball with the arm). There was also a stonewall pen against Everton not given, despite them not being top 6 they are a team that often take points from the bigger teams and that was during a first half we dominated and the first goal may have meant an entirely different second half.
Where was the like for like last season? Calls they should have seen but didn't in a top 6 clash that went City's way... Your turn... hint I've already gone through most of them and explained why they pale in comparison(some even correctly called).
I'm going back to the red card Balotelli should have received for stamp on the Scotty Parker and saying on yeah evens out I see it now... what logic are you working from? That's not how to compare logically.
