I've not read the full thread, but I'll just point out a fact for you. For City to get the away draws in domestic cups against the top flight opposition we did, was 100,000:1.So, I guess that's a "yes" - we should just take your word for whatever you believe - no proof necessary?
Oh, and I get it - you're probably mathmatically incapable of responding in any meaningful way.
But I'll give you the benefit of doubt and assume that you are capable of such a response but "don't have the time."
=========
Hmm...
Let's think for a bit....
Manchester City - with billions at its disposal - hasn't made the claims that you have.
Assuming that cheating against City was so obvious... don't you think that they'd hire a competent statistical team able to easily prove the systematic cheating against City to then force action to rectify this wrong?
Or maybe the conspiracy theory continues further - that the FA is corrupt that English Parliament is corrupt and wouldn't take action given proof of FA corruption and that corporate football sponsors would also turn a blind eye and continue to support an proven corrupt regime - in other words, that the majority of stake holders in current power structure support the corrupt regime and that we have no recourse but to accept this as City management have.
===========
Please think things through - emotional, knee-jerk responses do nothing but stir up trouble.
I think I've derailed this thread - if you want my response to the above, PM me, or maybe there's a thread on this topic.I've not read the full thread, but I'll just point out a fact for you. For City to get the away draws in domestic cups against the top flight opposition we did, was 100,000:1.
For United to get the home draws & lower division clubs in the same period, the odds are probably not too disimilar, so lets say divide the chances by 100 to 1,000:1 being very very conservative. Then look at the FA sponsored by who??? Cup & look at Arsenal's home draws agains lower league opposition, lets say another 1,000:1 (although I'm sure they would both be far higher in reality)
So the odds for City getting the away draws vs the teams we did x same for united x same for Arsenal BEING RIDICULOUSLY conservative, & you're looking at 100,000,000,000:1. Not looking to get into your debate mate, & not saying that EVERYTHING is stacked up against us, but don't you find all of that a little odd?
Huge win in the C/L for Chelsea, coming from behind to beat Atletico. I wonder how many P/L teams will make it to the round of 16.
Not Liverpool they are shite.All of them
Of course it’s odd. The whole thing stinks of corruption. You will never convince those who want proof, whilst placing their critical facilities to one side.I've not read the full thread, but I'll just point out a fact for you. For City to get the away draws in domestic cups against the top flight opposition we did, was 100,000:1.
For United to get the home draws & lower division clubs in the same period, the odds are probably not too disimilar, so lets say divide the chances by 100 to 1,000:1 being very very conservative. Then look at the FA sponsored by who??? Cup & look at Arsenal's home draws agains lower league opposition, lets say another 1,000:1 (although I'm sure they would both be far higher in reality)
So the odds for City getting the away draws vs the teams we did x same for united x same for Arsenal BEING RIDICULOUSLY conservative, & you're looking at 100,000,000,000:1. Not looking to get into your debate mate, & not saying that EVERYTHING is stacked up against us, but don't you find all of that a little odd?