Agree with this, Morata's link up play is superb. He might score less than Costa but the players around him will score more.
Yeah, I must admit it's slightly surprising to see such support for Costa over Morata on a City forum.
Agree with this, Morata's link up play is superb. He might score less than Costa but the players around him will score more.
Morata has hit a bit of a sticky patch form wise and Costa hence gets better every week he doesn't play mate :)Yeah, I must admit it's slightly surprising to see such support for Costa over Morata on a City forum.
Morata has hit a bit of a sticky patch form wise and Costa hence gets better every week he doesn't play mate :)
Been thinking..........i remember going back to when roman took over chelsea and he started spending money and chelsea started winning things, did they get as much negative press/feedback of rival fans like we are getting now?
For me personally, i actually didnt have a grudge with them getting lucky with money, and it was nice for united and arsenal to have another club that could win things. At the time we werent really any worry to the big clubs, and my only hope for us winning anything was maybe an fa cup., so i actually quite enjoyed chelsea taking the title off united.
Maybe it just seems worse these days because of social media but we dont half get some serious shit on those platforms!!
i dont remember thousands of fans moaning about "oil money" back then!!
I honestly wasnt as bitter as some of these fans are now about us when chelsea got rich!
Haha I like Zappacosta tbh, give him time to adapt to the league, happens a lot though, Clichy used to turn into a World beater on here when he was out before magically turning back into the useless excuse for a footballer he actually was :)You should listen to Chelsea fans. Victor Moses turned into a mix of prime Dani Alves and Cafu while he was injured and we had to watch Zappacosta try and be a footballer for 3 weeks :).
Mate it was worse.
We were a disgrace to humanity, we were destroying football, even now, people blame Chelsea for City being this good :) Trust me, count your blessings that Chelsea did it first :)
Haha I like Zappacosta tbh, give him time to adapt to the league, happens a lot though, Clichy used to turn into a World beater on here when he was out before magically turning back into the useless excuse for a footballer he actually was :)
ha ha! sorry man :-) well i must have been in the vast minority then who didnt mind you getting lucky!
I knew 2 City fans back in 2004, both were highly critical of Chelsea and their "method of success". I had lost touch with them by 2008, so I never got to ask them about City's money and troll them about their hypocrisy.