dubblue said:They are better than us. Simple as that,while we brought in a few good players to improve the squad they brought in the top top players to improve their first 11.
foxy said:Costa is a classless prick. I hope Zabaleta sorts him out when we play Chelsea. Howard was right to go over.
I have said it before, but I think City not only have better players in the first 11, but better players in the squad too. Chelsea have a more balanced and better put together team. Mourinho is a master at putting together teams with great chemistry and balance. City still have more players that can pull out with a bit of magic though.pikku said:dubblue said:They are better than us. Simple as that,while we brought in a few good players to improve the squad they brought in the top top players to improve their first 11.
Our squad is no less than chelsea's in terms of quality,the main difference is the mentality of players and the coach and the way in which they approach the games.They have started and looked very well though.We looked lethargic and complacent for most parts of the game against Stoke.I hope we can turn it around with the games against arsenal and chelsea.
LOL. So true everyone knows and goes on about Arsenal's annual collapse around February, but not many people mention Chelsea's 'difficult moment' (as dubbed by Ancelottli) from about November onwards. For the last 5 years it has been pretty much every season. Will be interesting to see if Mourinho can change this.moomba said:Chelsea havent had their annual meltdown yet
For me pellegrini is a bit naive tactically or more so stubborn for not being too flexible with team formations when compared to mourinho.supercrystal7 said:I have said it before, but I think City not only have better players in the first 11, but better players in the squad too. Chelsea have a more balanced and better put together team. Mourinho is a master at putting together teams with great chemistry and balance. City still have more players that can pull out with a bit of magic though.pikku said:dubblue said:They are better than us. Simple as that,while we brought in a few good players to improve the squad they brought in the top top players to improve their first 11.
Our squad is no less than chelsea's in terms of quality,the main difference is the mentality of players and the coach and the way in which they approach the games.They have started and looked very well though.We looked lethargic and complacent for most parts of the game against Stoke.I hope we can turn it around with the games against arsenal and chelsea.
I missed the game. What did he do?foxy said:Costa is a classless prick. I hope Zabaleta sorts him out when we play Chelsea. Howard was right to go over.
pikku said:For me pellegrini is a bit naive tactically or more so stubborn for not being too flexible with team formations when compared to mourinho.supercrystal7 said:I have said it before, but I think City not only have better players in the first 11, but better players in the squad too. Chelsea have a more balanced and better put together team. Mourinho is a master at putting together teams with great chemistry and balance. City still have more players that can pull out with a bit of magic though.pikku said:Our squad is no less than chelsea's in terms of quality,the main difference is the mentality of players and the coach and the way in which they approach the games.They have started and looked very well though.We looked lethargic and complacent for most parts of the game against Stoke.I hope we can turn it around with the games against arsenal and chelsea.
SWP's back said:I missed the game. What did he do?foxy said:Costa is a classless prick. I hope Zabaleta sorts him out when we play Chelsea. Howard was right to go over.