You're right and you're wrong imo mate. When it comes to psychology I believe he's exceptional at motivating a group of twenty/thirty somethings. This is manifest.He really isn't. I'm not saying for one minute he called her a slut, but he is certainly capable of it. When he loses his temper he loses control, hence the eye gouging incident. He seems to have taken over the gpc's mantle of some sort of supreme fucking being in the eyes of the media and fans. Just like the gpc, everything he says or does is accredited to him being a genius at psychology and put down to mind games. It's utter fucking bollocks.
You're right and you're wrong imo mate. When it comes to psychology I believe he's exceptional at motivating a group of twenty/thirty somethings. This is manifest.
I think he's much less skilled at manipulating the media, as I believe we're about to witness. Quite simply those are forces which, ultimately, are not containable in a world of chaos.
Some people have difficulty realising that genius in one discipline doesn't usually transfer to any other. He's exceptional at motivating young athletes; why is it concomitant that he is supreme a manipulating the media? Because the former is true, some people, unbelievably, are more disposed to believe the latter. It's more than a little insane when you think about it in those terms.I concur with that mate, my point was more about his comments and actions off the training ground. Like the gpc he can make a comment that if anyone else made it they would be ridiculed as a twat/sore loser/idiot or whatever. Even on this thread some people are convinced that raging at a female member of staff in public and humiliating her in front of the worlds media is a tactic to deflect people from the teams poor performance on the pitch.
There may be trouble ahead... as the song goes. Especially if we humiliate them on Sunday, and the usual suspects lose their rag and there's a sending off or 2.
On the other hand, we lose 1-0 & Maureen comes up smelling of roses again.
Can't wait....