And now 90m on this new fella ;-)
Well more like 62m and then an extra 25m or so if we win some big trophies :)
And now 90m on this new fella ;-)
Well more like 62m and then an extra 25m or so if we win some big trophies :)
Point still stands though. We get so much crap any time we sign a player and the PL and Uefa have hounded City over FFP. Seemingly Chelsea have just a free pass to write off over 1.5 billion pounds worth of debt and spend whatever they like without any kind of criticism. Compare this to the outrage if we sign Bellingham this summer and how we are cheating the world of football.
I'll hold my hands up, i was looking at it in euros on transfermarket. It looked much better my way i thought ;)I honestly do take your point and understood what you were getting at. Just didn't want to let the incorrect numbers stand unchallenged :)
Yeah...that was my point with the winkie thingy.
agents fees, wages, dinner money, dads pay off and media greasing palms im i getting close to higher feesNice of you add a couple of million to each transfer. I'm sure you can make the same point without inflating the numbers for no reason :)
Havertz 75m
Fofana 75m
Cucurella 56m (rising to 62m)
Kepa 71m
Pulisic 54m
Lukaku 97m
So you're collectively off by nearly 40m.
I popped my cherry with a girl called Kerry Dixon in 1977, still get the piss taken from that one!for some reason kerry dixon was one of my favourite players when i was a nipper
1.6bHavertz 80, fofana 80, Cucurella 65, Kepa 80, pulisi 60, Lukaku 100 - imagine if that was us, the football world would implode. They got a 1.3 billion pound hand out when roman sold up and now have spunked half a billion in one season. PL should be looking at these cunts and not us.
Something very wrong with Mr Boley and the way he spends other peoples money, something very wrong.Cheers mate. Very considerate suggestion. I will thanks :)