halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,128
In hindsight, the ruthless culture at Chelsea was the wrong choice but honestly, looking at the results Potter managed over the last 7 months, most managers at most clubs would have been sacked. Southampton sacked Nathan Jones for a run of results that was better than Chelsea at the time of his sacking. Unless the manager has some kind of kind of bond already established with the club, they usually do not survive the kind of results Potter has produced.
If he had just slightly higher in the table, but still vastly underperforming, like say 6th or 7th I'm pretty sure he would still be in the job. But we're 11th. I don't see how anyone can defend that, despite all of the obstacles he has faced.
Played 29 games, lost 10 isn't good, of course. But if two of those had been wins, you would have been 7th, so basically he was sacked for the results of two games out of 29. Seems to me Boehly has panicked at the thought of missing out on CL football and all that entails and, in doing so, has just highlighted the craziness of his recruitment of, firstly, players and, secondly, the manager.
Do you have any confidence that he will appoint a manager this time who can handle such a bloated and dysfunctional squad? Actually, is there one?