Chelsea Thread - 2023/24

[mancboy]

Todd by hook or by crook will sell 100m worth of players before 30th of June because the whole club is the line if they don't! A probably 15/20 point deduction if the league form continues next season they'll be on trouble of going down..

who are their saleable assets, palmer, gallager, nkunku, fernandes and caicedo theyd lose 50m each on easy

 

[waspish]

who are their saleable assets, palmer, gallager, nkunku, fernandes and caicedo theyd lose 50m each on easy

I don't look at the player names I look at there problem and Todd will sell 100m worth or players

 

[TinFoilHat]

Mourinho actually wouldn't be a bad choice in the short term. He would at least make them harder to play against and get them up the table. It might not be pretty, but he does get results. The problem is you all know how the story ends.

Hilariously for us.
:)
Not sure Alti Fan would like to see him back.

 

[Bruno39]

Until Todd and whoever he's employing to run the club work out what the hell they are doing - Poch may as well stay. The manager is the least of their worries, and Poch isn't the worst out there. Fans will turn on him, and he'll get hounded out, and his career stock tank mind...

Not that Chelsea can afford sack Poch and his staff their that far in the shit anyway!

97.5M worth of Lukaku is contracted there until 2026 and has been out on loan for 2 seasons in Italy already - their stuck with him on the balance sheet, and no doubt paying around 50% of his wages to play for another team.

Just watch as they'll sell Gallagher and even Colwill at the right price to help raise the £100M for Victor Osimehn though!

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Whats his value now?
And who could pay it?

If he signed on a 7.5 year deal last January, it’ll be £110m x 6/8= £82.5m in the summer.

A few clubs could pay that.

None will.

 

[Vialli98]

If he signed on a 7.5 year deal last January, it’ll be £110m x 6/8= £82.5m in the summer.

A few clubs could pay that.

None will.

And that’s good.

 

[Vialli98]

His entire argument here is basically that Villa competing for the cup would have been great because it’s a new team winning. Of course Carragher doesn’t think it’s bad for football when Liverpool knock Fulham out of the semis of the other cup.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

His entire argument here is basically that Villa competing for the cup would have been great because it’s a new team winning. Of course Carragher doesn’t think it’s bad for football when Liverpool knock Fulham out of the semis of the other cup.

There could be different winners however we are 11 years into the FFP experiment that they are using to fuck over City and Chelsea. It’s stifled the growth of Aston Villa, Newcastle, Wolves etc and has resulted in clubs scared to spend money. Who were one of the culprits pushing for it, then lovely Liverpool execs.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

His entire argument here is basically that Villa competing for the cup would have been great because it’s a new team winning. Of course Carragher doesn’t think it’s bad for football when Liverpool knock Fulham out of the semis of the other cup.

Only my opinion of course, but I think Carragher getting so much airtime is bad for football.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

And that’s good.

For everyone else, yeah.

I don’t see anything, maybe barring free kick taking now he’s actually scored one, that Kovacic can’t do better.