JRockBlues
Well-Known Member
Shame he ran down his contract as I think we had a decent sell-on clause there.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Chelsea Thread - 2023/24
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Shame he ran down his contract as I think we had a decent sell-on clause there.
Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Another Pep clone, they all want to be him. Lol
BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,990
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Chelsea have a bunch of talent. Beats me why they've not been able to pull it together in the last few seasons.
Chelsea have a bunch of talent. Beats me why they've not been able to pull it together in the last few seasons.
Eh? Thought it was quite obvious why they have struggled.
BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,990
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Not for me. Lots of money. And no entrenched bullshit ownership-on-down, who-the-fuck cares attitude. It seems to me that ownership wants to win and is willing to spend.Eh? Thought it was quite obvious why they have struggled.
IMO Chelsea is free of the entrenched who-cares attitude that plagues the scum... 4th next season wouldn't shock me.
Last edited:
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 61,326
Having good players is only one part of being successful. Being a team is the most important. Buying players in a scattergun manner, whilst changing manager every 6 months is largely their issue.Not for me. Lots of money. And no entrenched bullshit managerial who-the-fuck cares attitude. It seems to me that ownership wants to win and is willing to spend.
IMO Chelsea is free of the entrenched who-cares attitude that plagues the scum... 4th next season wouldn't shock me.
Not for me. Lots of money. And no entrenched bullshit ownership-on-down, who-the-fuck cares attitude. It seems to me that ownership wants to win and is willing to spend.
IMO Chelsea is free of the entrenched who-cares attitude that plagues the scum... 4th next season wouldn't shock me.
Lack of a top goal scorer. Unbalanced and inexperience squad. Huge PSR challenges. Might push for top 4 but no better.
BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,990
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Yeah, beyond 4th would surprise me as we, Arsenal and Liverpool are all likely out-of-reach of Chelsea (or any other squad) next season.Lack of a top goal scorer. Unbalanced and inexperience squad. Might push for top 4 but no better.
Yeah, beyond 4th would surprise me as we, Arsenal and Liverpool are all likely out-of-reach of Chelsea (or any other squad) next season.
I don’t think Liverpool are out of reach. It’s a transition season coming up for them too.
“
The amendment failed, however, because several clubs thought the wording of the ban was too wide, according to people with knowledge of the proposal. It did not clearly distinguish between the type of non-football revenues that clubs believe they should be encouraged to exploit, such as building hotels, houses or indoor arenas, and the accountancy tricks of selling existing property to yourself.
It is therefore almost certain that the Premier League will try to tighten up its proposal and bring it back to the clubs, as it believes it needs more tools to effectively regulate the clubs to ensure sustainability and fair competition.”
The amendment failed, however, because several clubs thought the wording of the ban was too wide, according to people with knowledge of the proposal. It did not clearly distinguish between the type of non-football revenues that clubs believe they should be encouraged to exploit, such as building hotels, houses or indoor arenas, and the accountancy tricks of selling existing property to yourself.
It is therefore almost certain that the Premier League will try to tighten up its proposal and bring it back to the clubs, as it believes it needs more tools to effectively regulate the clubs to ensure sustainability and fair competition.”
- Status
- Not open for further replies.