well its not working for them so far is itCreative management in terms of the financials I suspect. Irritating how they keep signing anything that moves.
well its not working for them so far is itCreative management in terms of the financials I suspect. Irritating how they keep signing anything that moves.
Long may that continue!well its not working for them so far is it
their kid in a sweetshop recruitment strategy is hilariousLong may that continue!
Government are threatening to ban all far right protesters from attending football matches.
If that gets pushed through Stamford Bridge will be half empty this season.
how can it possibly go well on the pitch, how can you keep any kind of club harmony or dressing room harmony when most of these players have no indeed when or where they will be playing or how they should be playing its baffling.Chelsea transfer window seems to be the opposite of ours, but still not exciting? It'd be interesting to hear the thoughts of Chelsea fans?
Whereas we have only one major incoming and many are clamouring for more, Chelsea seem to have gone for everyone and their mother in law, yet still don't really have a defined team, identity or style? What isn't it now, with Neto, 49 registered first team players?
I suppose it's one of those where, if it goes well on the pitch, who cares? I don't particularly have a problem with it, but if that was us I'd be a bit worried about the scattergun approach continuing from last year with Yosemite Sam firing his blank(cheques)s in very direction.
I think most have to go on loan, but didn't they change the rules on loans a few years back, specifically because it was felt Chelsea and City were hoarding too much talent?how can it possibly go well on the pitch, how can you keep any kind of club harmony or dressing room harmony when most of these players have no indeed when or where they will be playing or how they should be playing its baffling.