sweep said:
allblues09 said:
Dodge said:
Robbie's been linked to certain illegal deposits that are, in fact, directly responsible for the worldwide banking crisis. He could sort out the Palestinian issue if he could be arsed. Certain accusations are about to hit the papers about his links to Bin Laden & the Taliban.
He's to blame for every bad thing thats ever happened.
This is all too true. It is a shame that the fate of the world hangs in balance and yet he is a lazy Brazilian. :)
On Chris Bailey, I bet he did not even watch the game, instead he was at home crying over his loss at Fulham.
I watched it and agree with Bailey's assesment. Unlike some I have no great problem with Robbie's lack of bottle, thats not what he was brought here for, though obviously I wouldn't complain if he challenged more. The reason he was slated so badly yesterday was because he gave us fuck all in the way of attacking threat, if we want someone who runs around a lot while playing safe sideways and backward passes we should pick Vassel.
Really, I thought that Robinho was integral to our attacking play yesterday. He pushed forward, had 4 shots on target, completed 26 of 29 passes and was one of our only players in the box for most crosses. All in all I thought he had a very positive game, aside from the penalty. Why do you think he did not give us any attacking option? Plus, Vassie would not have 4 shots on target (as much as I like Vassell).