Not saying you’re wrong mate, but from experience of both, I know which one I’d prefer heading :-)It's nothing to do with the weight of the ball, it's the velocity of it.
Balls these days travel much faster so the impact is worse than the old balls of yesteryear.
Yes but it’s acceleration. As in the rate of change of velocity as opposed to the velocity itself
If the velocity stays the same then the force stays the same
Sure but they’re obviously linked. It doesn’t factor in distance, drag, wind, rain, thickness of skull etc.
I wasn’t trying to suggest it was the perfect equation to solve the heading issue, it was to show that a ball half the weight would have to accelerate at twice the rate to create the same force.
it's a bit too simplistic that mate. A football travelling at say 70 mph has the same momentum as a cruise liner doing about 0.0000001 mph. Clearly the latter wouldn't snap your head back very much, would it.The ball needs twice the velocity to cause the same force on impact if the ball weighs half as much, ceteris paribus. It doesn't need to be accelerating at all.
It is the head that accelerates backwards as a result of the force on impact. Which is the issue, of course.
it's a bit too simplistic that mate. A football travelling at say 70 mph has the same momentum as a cruise liner doing about 0.0000001 mph. Clearly the latter wouldn't snap your head back very much, would it.