Gingers Dad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 8,109
Fckin fashion policeWearing flares is a bit 89-91 but to fine the poor **** and ban him for 3 years is wildly disproportionate imo.
Fckin fashion policeWearing flares is a bit 89-91 but to fine the poor **** and ban him for 3 years is wildly disproportionate imo.
Where’s the humour in throwing a flare on the pitch when we still needed to score a fucking goal?Wow. There are some humourless cunts on here.
Not disproportionate enough for me.Seems hugely disproportionate to me.
How long do you think a ban for throwing a flare on the pitch should be?Not disproportionate enough for me.
Think it’s the dog with a line through it.I didn’t see ‘no petting’ on that sign??
Same as similar incidents elsewhere. I read recently I can’t find or think where about the PFA being unhappy with any encroachment by fans, objects etc and quoting uk workplace safely regulations. Would be expecting more and more of this type of sentence.Seems hugely disproportionate to me.
Yeah, I guess there’s a precedent there. Still seems wrong though that this guy is facing the same ban as the guy who made monkey gestures at Fred at The Etihad.Same as similar incidents elsewhere. I read recently I can’t find or think where about the PFA being unhappy with any encroachment by fans, objects etc and quoting uk workplace safely regulations. Would be expecting more and more of this type of sentence.
Agreed but I reckon the genie is out of the bottle on these incidents and add to that the dipper shitshow in France.. and tabloid headlines about football returning to the dark old days etc. PL and teams , including ours will not want English fan behaviour to be used as a stick to threaten bans from the money printer or to “sully” the product for big money sponsors etc. I was quite shocked at the end of our last game V Villa when I watched it later on TV and saw Laporte. He honestly looked terrified.Yeah, I guess there’s a precedent there. Still seems wrong though that this guy is facing the same ban as the guy who made monkey gestures at Fred at The Etihad.
Yeah, I don’t think that’s right personally.Both got the minimum 3 years.
Yeah think that anything with a racist or hate crime element should be seen as an aggravating factor.Yeah, I don’t think that’s right personally.
Tbf, I’ve seen games in European competitions this season that were far worse in terms of pyrotechnics than that.Agreed but I reckon the genie is out of the bottle on these incidents and add to that the dipper shitshow in France.. and tabloid headlines about football returning to the dark old days etc. PL and teams , including ours will not want English fan behaviour to be used as a stick to threaten bans from the money printer or to “sully” the product for big money sponsors etc. I was quite shocked at the end of our last game V Villa when I watched it later on TV and saw Laporte. He honestly looked terrified.
There could be a minimum fixed penalty notice to avoid court and criminalisation, £500 first offence for example, mainly just to not waste court time like for driving and town centre disorder offences.Yeah, I don’t think that’s right personally.
So if he hadn't thrown it onto the pitch, the course of events could have changed......If it's the one who threw one on the pitch when we chasing a goal then it should have been a lifetime ban.
Indeed, much in the same way that The Smiths could have been different if Suggs was their lead singer.So if he hadn't thrown it onto the pitch, the course of events could have changed......
Indeed, much in the same way that The Smiths could have been different if Suggs was their lead singer.
Love that the Polish word for drone is Drony
It's actually dron. Drony is the plural.
You can thank me later ;-)
My girl-friend‘s in a coma tooWho can forget the classic "This charming Man With Baggy Trousers".