City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

[keith's curle]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Quotes from Redcafe please, I'm certainly not clicking on their site.

 

[Hamann Pineapple]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Quotes from Redcafe please, I'm certainly not clicking on their site.

Pogue Mahone said: ↑

Enormous sponsorship deals with companies that - purely coincidentally - are based in the same country as their owners.

Unbelievable Jeff

 

[Stephenhakin]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Quotes from Redcafe please, I'm certainly not clicking on their site.

Seriously, how is City's revenue more than Chelsea's?

Such a scammy club.


one of my favourites!

 

[Stephenhakin]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Quotes from Redcafe please, I'm certainly not clicking on their site.

Seriously, how is City's revenue more than Chelsea's?

Such a scammy club.


one of my favourites!

Enormous sponsorship deals with companies that - purely coincidentally - are based in the same country as their owners.

Another - like its illegal or something. I think the poor little raggies want the rules re-written bless them

 

[moomba]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Where is Chevrolet based again?

 

[SilverFox2]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

It's hurting them...... some of the replies are great.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.redcafe.net/threads/football-financials.398945/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.redcafe.net/threads/football ... ls.398945/</a>

Oh the poor loves !! Heheheheheeee.

Bless them. Definitely living back in 2008 some of these. They certainly don't understand what we have been doing.

Hardly surprising, the comments are representative of the skewed opinion that the media has been feeding them in order to sell papers for several years.

 

[Stephenhakin]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Where is Chevrolet based again?

I know...clever bunch them rags.

 

[Stephenhakin]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

I am not sure but if you take out the match day figures for both clubs do we turnover more? I know a while back we were about 80m down on Matchday? Anyone got comparable stats?

 

[supercity88]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

I love the one comment about the rags wages being big but because of how much they pay to staff in their commercial department!!! What a clown! So Di Maria, Falcao, Van Persie and Rooney on however many thousands of pounds a week has no bearing, it's actually Joe Bloggs head of commercial development and his £100,000 a year salary that puts their expenditure on wages so high!

 

[KenTheLandlord]

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Quotes from Redcafe please, I'm certainly not clicking on their site.

Seriously, how is City's revenue more than Chelsea's?

Such a scammy club.


one of my favourites!

Enormous sponsorship deals with companies that - purely coincidentally - are based in the same country as their owners.

Another - like its illegal or something. I think the poor little raggies want the rules re-written bless them

Poor old Trizy is in a right old tizzy

If City are allowed get away with those numbers the FFP has failed. The way the clubs should be looked at is by its market value, similar to how houses are valued when being sold, even with City's recent success there is no way they can be pulling numbers ahead of Arsenal, Liverpool & Chelsea, maybe even Spurs.

Of course it has failed you cretin it was never going to work.
Yes, that's right change the rules again to see how clubs would look like if they were houses.
ffs do they make these clowns up or is something that breathes really that gormless?