City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

I suspect our rivals are going to be given a huge reminder of the thing they feared more than most.

Sheikh Mansour deciding money doesn't really matter, whatever the cost.

These imbeciles never realised he and City were actually being prudent, previously.

That's the reality of wealth that could buy Messi and Ronaldo in the same day if that was their inclination.

Economies of scale and all that.
 
M18CTID said:
squirtyflower said:
aguero93:20 said:
Funny it's taken UEFA so long to realise this, any decent lawyer could have told them that from day 1. Article 101 is sacrosant in European Law.
Indeed, and quite a few posters on here having been arguing against it for some time
Mean while we have lost three years of impetus and some great players that we would have put a bid in for

It has certainly put our brakes on and allowed Arsenal and Scum to catch up

We've also missed out on Falcao and Di Maria as a result of FFP so it's not all bad!

And Sanchez and ozil
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I suspect our rivals are going to be given a huge reminder of the thing they feared more than most.

Sheikh Mansour deciding money doesn't really matter, whatever the cost.

These imbeciles never realised he and City were actually being prudent, previously.

That's the reality of wealth that could buy Messi and Ronaldo in the same day if that was their inclination.

Economies of scale and all that.

I wish it was! Or at least Bale and Pogba anyway.
Why are we 'only' going for the likes of Firmino & De Bruyne if FFP is no longer an issue?
 
Tueart1976 said:
This is Platini's latest interview, from UEFA.org, regarding relaxing FFP:

UEFA President Michel Platini has outlined the successful implementation of financial fair play during 2012-15 and the process which has been undertaken in relation to the drafting of the 2015-18 UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations.

Have you changed the approach in relation to financial fair play?

Michel Platini: No. Clubs need to continue to live within their means. We have been in a long consultation process which has taken into account views from all stakeholders. The conclusions are that everyone wants financial fair play to stay. The objective of financial fair play remains the same, we have just been working on moving from a period of austerity to one where we can offer more opportunities for sustainable growth.

What has financial fair play brought to European football?

Michel Platini: Financial fair play has led to a dramatic improvement in club finances and has restored business credibility in our sport. When we began this process, financial losses stood at €1.7bn per year, but now it is in the €400m-€500m range. In a short period of time, financial fair play is achieving what it set out to do: restore the financial health of European football and put clubs on a much better and more solid financial foundation.

How long has the process taken?

Michel Platini: We are constantly in discussions with our stakeholders. This is part of the UEFA governance model. However, I'd say the process kicked off in earnest as early as 2013, under the auspices of the Club Licensing Committee chaired by David Gill, with consultation involving all relevant stakeholders with the support of the UEFA administration.

What is the future for financial fair play?

Michel Platini: Financial fair play is here to stay. Over the past three years, the Club Financial Control Body has learned substantially from the process, and now the proposed changes to the regulations will build on the successes achieved whilst adapting to changed, and improved, economic circumstances. The overall objective remains the same: to provide a regulatory environment which supports clubs in creating sustainable growth for the long term, while maintaining financial stability.

Is it normal for regulations to be updated?

Michel Platini: It is entirely normal for regulations to be updated. In fact, it would be abnormal if regulations never changed! Updates and adaptations are part of the regular life cycle of European football regulations. These regulations came into being in 2010 and were already updated in 2012.

What effect will the regulations have on the existing settlement agreements?

Michel Platini: The existing settlements will remain in force. The sporting restrictions and financial contributions, therefore, will not be affected.

When will the regulations come into effect?

Michel Platini: Any updates to the regulations will be discussed at various committees before being presented to the UEFA Executive Committee for ratification at its next meeting, which takes place in Prague on 29/30 June.

©UEFA.com 1998-2014. All rights reserved.

http://www.uefa.org/about-uefa/pres...ml#financial+fair+play+objective+remains+same

I read into that,''Hmmm....we may have cocked up legally trying to stop the new upstarts threat and we are now cooking up new rules and obstacles we CAN stop them with!''

How about a very simple rule you toad?? If you are a club in debt you can't go splashing out money on new players until that debt is cleared? Doesn't that sound sensible and fair...hey...hey???
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I suspect our rivals are going to be given a huge reminder of the thing they feared more than most.

Sheikh Mansour deciding money doesn't really matter, whatever the cost.

These imbeciles never realised he and City were actually being prudent, previously.

That's the reality of wealth that could buy Messi and Ronaldo in the same day if that was their inclination.

Economies of scale and all that.
Well Smithers
 
'What effect will the regulations have on the existing settlement agreements?

Michel Platini: The existing settlements will remain in force. The sporting restrictions and financial contributions, therefore, will not be affected.'

Might be taking it the wrong way but I reckon that rules out any sort of financial return from the penalties.
 
HolisticJim said:
M18CTID said:
squirtyflower said:
Indeed, and quite a few posters on here having been arguing against it for some time
Mean while we have lost three years of impetus and some great players that we would have put a bid in for

It has certainly put our brakes on and allowed Arsenal and Scum to catch up

We've also missed out on Falcao and Di Maria as a result of FFP so it's not all bad!

And Sanchez and ozil

So it's saved us from RVP, Falcao, Di Maria and Ozil. That's pretty good.
 
aguero93:20 said:
HolisticJim said:
M18CTID said:
We've also missed out on Falcao and Di Maria as a result of FFP so it's not all bad!

And Sanchez and ozil

So it's saved us from RVP, Falcao, Di Maria and Ozil. That's pretty good.
Sanchez would be good in our team
It has stopped us buying Suarez, Kroos, Martinez and Phil Jones
 
HolisticJim said:
M18CTID said:
squirtyflower said:
Indeed, and quite a few posters on here having been arguing against it for some time
Mean while we have lost three years of impetus and some great players that we would have put a bid in for

It has certainly put our brakes on and allowed Arsenal and Scum to catch up

We've also missed out on Falcao and Di Maria as a result of FFP so it's not all bad!

And Sanchez and ozil

I'm talking about the players that have flopped and proved to be a waste of money - do keep up!
 
Jack Wills said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I suspect our rivals are going to be given a huge reminder of the thing they feared more than most.

Sheikh Mansour deciding money doesn't really matter, whatever the cost.

These imbeciles never realised he and City were actually being prudent, previously.

That's the reality of wealth that could buy Messi and Ronaldo in the same day if that was their inclination.

Economies of scale and all that.

I wish it was! Or at least Bale and Pogba anyway.
Why are we 'only' going for the likes of Firmino & De Bruyne if FFP is no longer an issue?

Who says we are ?? The media ?? Enough said.The cockwombles of the earth.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.