aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Re: City & FFP (continued)
que custodiet ipsos custodies?
CAS.
It is, their own rules don't even make a provision for their exclusion. So it's discriminatory and acting outside the rules which they themselves drew up.bluemoondays said:Agreed, weird. How can you have different entry criteria for teams entering the same competition.ChicagoBlue said:Liverpool will be in the CL next season with ZERO PENALTY, even though they have lost $90M in the last two seasons.
So, in effect, City could be forced into a distinct disadvantage next season, while ANY club that did not comply with FFP (Liverpool and Monaco!) can compete against City without any sanctions SOLELY BECAUSE THEY DID NOT COMPETE IN CL LAST SEASON!
ABSOLUTELY CRAZY!!
Surely, the fact that Monaco and Liverpool are NOT getting assessed for FFP is discriminatory?
que custodiet ipsos custodies?
CAS.