City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Hungarian blue said:
MSP said:
Could anyone tell me why Liverpool was not looked at at all?

Because they were not present in Europe for that monitoring period at all.

But I think, even if they would have been, they would just about made it as they whole losses were cca. 40m / season and some of these figures do not count for FFP.

They lost around £100m in the last two seasons. Take out a generous £20m for exemptions and they sit at £80m loss. They can't use the pre 2010 deduction as their accounts don't show an improving trend.

They also haven't converted those losses to equity, so their limit for FFP purposes is €5m. They fail by around £77m.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Paddy Barclay is, always has been, and always will be a ****.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Paddy Barclay believes that Januzaj is the best uncapped player in premier league history. Says it all really.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

stony said:
Paddy Barclay is, always has been, and always will be a ****.
Suggestion - Break out Thundercunt for this ****?
PBIATC
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Hihosilva said:
Patrick Barclay at it now.

If you put a 30mph limit on a stretch of road, and augment the clear signage with an intensive publicity campaign and then, having identified a few drivers who insist on blatantly exceeding it with 60mph dashes, sit them down and offer help in curbing the habit, and still they indulge in it, what are you supposed to do next? Abolish any speed limit, at whatever cost to pedestrians and the other road users who asked for it in the first place?



Manchester City’s posture in apparently opposing the heavy fine — estimated at between £39million and £49m — and Champions League squad restrictions imposed for a massive breach of the Financial Fair Play regulations is as ridiculous as some of the spending on players that caused them to exceed UEFA’s limit.

Sheikh Mansour and his advisers have known about FFP since they took over the club from Thaksin Shinawatra in 2008. They knew about it when they bought David Silva and Yaya Toure and didn’t let it prevent them from trying to outbid Manchester United for Robin van Persie in the middle of the FFP assessment period, even though they were already overpaying two other former Arsenal players, Gael Clichy and Samir Nasri.

While you can say what you like about FFP and what it might do for the dream factor in football — not as much harm as some claim but that’s an argument for another time — it exists and it’s constitutional, not a wild idea that UEFA president Michel Platini has been able to impose single-handedly.

It is also designed to encourage building from the roots up and City need no instruction in this, having embraced the principle enshrined in the exemptions for infrastructure and youth development by building an education complex of the highest standard. So they deserve the sort of success that should be confirmed on Sunday. But they cannot be above football’s international law.





He needs to get his facts right before writing drivel. Sheikh Mansour was not aware of any ffp when he purchased Manchester City. It was only agreed in principle in September 2009.

What UEFA are doing, to extend this rather tedious analogy, is catching somebody doing 31 in a 30 zone, but then using the rules on what actually constitutes speeding to increase the recorded speed artificially from 31 to 60.

And then fine you £50m.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Barclay is dickhead. How can £7m be overpaying for a PL left back and, arguably, £24m overpaying for a class attacking midfielder when the scum just paid £37m for one.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.