Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Re: Re:
It's currently being challenged but its the break even rule that they have gone for.
But to reiterate again its worth looking at the two new rules and then people will realise that it's only giving an opposing team the right to object to a plea bargain.
We have no need to plea bargain as we haven't been punished. The press have jumped on a small change in the rules which allow a club to have a say in another clubs plea bargain.
So lets say we we're punished, which I can't see why we would be. UEFA say right you can't sign any players for a year. We say call it a 10 mill fine. UEFA say ok. arsenal say we think its unfair because etc etc.
It's all ifs and buts.
Keith Moon said:Prestwich_Blue said:In short, because it restricts competition. I believe that legal opinion given to our owners supports this.Forzacitizens said:Keith, can you explain to
Me why it contravenes EU law?
Correct, a judicial challenge of the FFPR at ECJ will only have one outcome.
It's currently being challenged but its the break even rule that they have gone for.
But to reiterate again its worth looking at the two new rules and then people will realise that it's only giving an opposing team the right to object to a plea bargain.
We have no need to plea bargain as we haven't been punished. The press have jumped on a small change in the rules which allow a club to have a say in another clubs plea bargain.
So lets say we we're punished, which I can't see why we would be. UEFA say right you can't sign any players for a year. We say call it a 10 mill fine. UEFA say ok. arsenal say we think its unfair because etc etc.
It's all ifs and buts.