remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Re: "City face Euro Expulsion"
Simple, let the Sheik cut the oil off to Europe !
Simple, let the Sheik cut the oil off to Europe !
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Re: "City face Euro Expulsion"
It's all kept we Davys loss to page 7, which is convinient.
It's all kept we Davys loss to page 7, which is convinient.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Re: "City face Euro Expulsion"
Good I don't want him sacked after coming under pressure. I'd like him to stay and systematically wreck them.
andyhinch said:It's all kept we Davys loss to page 7, which is convinient.
Good I don't want him sacked after coming under pressure. I'd like him to stay and systematically wreck them.
Re: "City face Euro Expulsion"
Chelsea are only still in the top 4 due to Abramovich. On the subject of inflating the transfer market both Chelsea and Arsenal's record transfer fee is higher than ours. Which 3 teams posted a £50 million loss last season? Big bad Manchester City - but of course Chelsea and Liverpool forget should be considered in that bracket too if that's how they are going about it. And Liverpool were happy to blow £35 million on an average player which remains one of football greatest buffoonery episodes.
I think the message from should rightly be: "you spend money on players and are not neutral - you sir have no legitimacy." Of course, most of those fans of those clubs are too thick to look at themselves in the mirror and think they spend no money on transfer at all.
If it was from mid-tabled clubs who were complaining at the levels of money being spent by 'big clubs' then I would take note. But the fact it is clearly an underhand move from bitter rivals who are clearly worried is incredible. The whole thing stinks to be honest.
Of course no one cares to mention that the Financial Fair Play and the above is most likely a contravention of EU Competition law and will be probably be found illegal in 2015 when the verdict in made in the Striani case.
I don't expect any less from Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal. I don't know who they think they are to be in a position to criticise another club's spending. Pot, kettle, black springs to mind.jrb said:I think as mind games go, Jose had stooped to a desperate and new low.
Chelsea are only still in the top 4 due to Abramovich. On the subject of inflating the transfer market both Chelsea and Arsenal's record transfer fee is higher than ours. Which 3 teams posted a £50 million loss last season? Big bad Manchester City - but of course Chelsea and Liverpool forget should be considered in that bracket too if that's how they are going about it. And Liverpool were happy to blow £35 million on an average player which remains one of football greatest buffoonery episodes.
I think the message from should rightly be: "you spend money on players and are not neutral - you sir have no legitimacy." Of course, most of those fans of those clubs are too thick to look at themselves in the mirror and think they spend no money on transfer at all.
If it was from mid-tabled clubs who were complaining at the levels of money being spent by 'big clubs' then I would take note. But the fact it is clearly an underhand move from bitter rivals who are clearly worried is incredible. The whole thing stinks to be honest.
Of course no one cares to mention that the Financial Fair Play and the above is most likely a contravention of EU Competition law and will be probably be found illegal in 2015 when the verdict in made in the Striani case.
buckshot
Well-Known Member
Re: "City face Euro Expulsion"
One day after the transfer window closes and City spent a grand total of ZERO they come out with this shit?
Pathetic.
One day after the transfer window closes and City spent a grand total of ZERO they come out with this shit?
Pathetic.
Keith Moon
Well-Known Member
Re: Re:
Correct, a judicial challenge of the FFPR at ECJ will only have one outcome.
Prestwich_Blue said:In short, because it restricts competition. I believe that legal opinion given to our owners supports this.Forzacitizens said:Keith, can you explain to
Me why it contravenes EU law?
Correct, a judicial challenge of the FFPR at ECJ will only have one outcome.
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
Re: "City face Euro Expulsion"
It worries me with the rags probably not making top four that they will try to dig up dirt on us and replace us in the competition with those fuckers<br /><br />-- Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:52 pm --<br /><br />It worries me with the rags probably not making top four that they will try to dig up dirt on us and replace us in the competition with those fuckers
It worries me with the rags probably not making top four that they will try to dig up dirt on us and replace us in the competition with those fuckers<br /><br />-- Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:52 pm --<br /><br />It worries me with the rags probably not making top four that they will try to dig up dirt on us and replace us in the competition with those fuckers
Blue Haze
Well-Known Member
Re: "City face Euro Expulsion"
If they even make a peep then unsettle Suarez and Sturridge. Any club who interferes with us should face repercussions.
jrb said:Can you imagine Liverpool FC taking on the financial and political might of Abu Dhabi?
If they even make a peep then unsettle Suarez and Sturridge. Any club who interferes with us should face repercussions.