City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

mrbelfry said:
Have we got a £50m fine as well? Couldn't see any mention of that in the city statement but it has been mentioned a few times
In the same way that we've spent a billion pounds, yeah.

As for people saying the Champions League is corrupt, it's not out-and-out cheating, but it's definitely heavily in favour of the established clubs and clubs from the bigger leagues. The BBC did a great article on it last year.

Safely into the group stage of the Champions League for a 16th straight season, having outclassed Fulham in the Premier League on Saturday, for Arsenal the immediate crisis is over.

But are they really one of the best six sides in Europe, as Uefa's seeding system would have us believe?

Every club's results in European competition over the past five years are counted equally, with no weighting to favour the most recent seasons - so the seeding reflects long-term consistency, rather than rewarding recent excellence.

Although domestic results are not part of the calculation, the national coefficient counts towards each team's total too - so it is better to come from a country with a stronger record in Europe.

The seeding means Arsenal - like Manchester United and Chelsea - automatically avoid some of the biggest and best teams in Europe and increase their chances of meeting some of the weaker sides in the draw.

Given a favourable draw - which for Arsenal, Manchester United and Chelsea probably means avoiding the likes of PSG, Dortmund or Napoli this time around - it is possible for pot one teams to maintain a coefficient high enough to keep them there solely through good results against lower-ranked teams in their group.

The whole thing is structured to favour the elite of Europe, and while I think accusations of cheating are wide of the mark, it's certainly the case that UEFA have been leaned on by the big clubs since the competition was established, so it's not a surprise to find out that the rules favour them.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

The best way to show everyone we have our ffp in order would be to announce our first signing/signings asap! Fans from other clubs are rejoicing at the minute thinking our punishment will stop us buying top players. The main point is we dont need a massive overhaul thank god and fernando, sagna and mangala Plus a left back if required certainly makes us alot stronger!
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

I'm With Stupid said:
mrbelfry said:
Have we got a £50m fine as well? Couldn't see any mention of that in the city statement but it has been mentioned a few times
In the same way that we've spent a billion pounds, yeah.

As for people saying the Champions League is corrupt, it's not out-and-out cheating, but it's definitely heavily in favour of the established clubs and clubs from the bigger leagues. The BBC did a great article on it last year.

Safely into the group stage of the Champions League for a 16th straight season, having outclassed Fulham in the Premier League on Saturday, for Arsenal the immediate crisis is over.

But are they really one of the best six sides in Europe, as Uefa's seeding system would have us believe?

Every club's results in European competition over the past five years are counted equally, with no weighting to favour the most recent seasons - so the seeding reflects long-term consistency, rather than rewarding recent excellence.

Although domestic results are not part of the calculation, the national coefficient counts towards each team's total too - so it is better to come from a country with a stronger record in Europe.

The seeding means Arsenal - like Manchester United and Chelsea - automatically avoid some of the biggest and best teams in Europe and increase their chances of meeting some of the weaker sides in the draw.

Given a favourable draw - which for Arsenal, Manchester United and Chelsea probably means avoiding the likes of PSG, Dortmund or Napoli this time around - it is possible for pot one teams to maintain a coefficient high enough to keep them there solely through good results against lower-ranked teams in their group.

The whole thing is structured to favour the elite of Europe, and while I think accusations of cheating are wide of the mark, it's certainly the case that UEFA have been leaned on by the big clubs since the competition was established, so it's not a surprise to find out that the rules favour them.
uefa are a political organsation,rather than a sporting body,its all about money and power
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

jrb said:
Success of Manchester City = Success For UAE

Success of Manchester City = Success For UAE

by Shuaib B Ahmed
on May 18, 2014
in General
Leave a comment


I once read somewhere that a fascination with football is the narcotic of an East Londoner waiting eagerly to escape into a daydream. Feeling euphoric, he longs for a moment to be part of a bigger whole. But, to what extent is celebrating the success of a team becomes a narcotic for us?

It can be said with an apparent pride that football in England is a religion. While we hold back from labeling the nation as gods in the sport, we associate the nation with those “who brought football upon us” – here in the UAE. Yes, they did, through British soldiers, who were present in the country due to mutual political motives during the early 19th century. Since then, football slowly crept into the lives of the locals compelling them to accept it as part of their lives. The rest was history.

Accomplishments of a team in a different country, a different continent normally does not result in intense celebrations in a country that’s 3.5K miles away.

Of course, it was not the first time that we celebrated the victory of a team as if it was our own national team. Manchester City regaining the title as


Premier League Champions was more importantly – a proud moment for the people of United Arab Emirates.
b.jpg

Courtesy of MCFC.com

The fortunes of Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan has given us a sense of irresistible pride as we delve further into the colors of City. Having managed to win a few titles already, the most significant achievement to date was to secure the belief and trust of skeptical City supporters and those who have come to see the club as the next headline maker in the arena of European football, even if their interests are different from Manchester City.

The matter of pride extends to the point where the overwhelming presence of the nation can be visible, in and around the stadium, be it through ad hoardings, gestures towards Sheikh Mansour and so on. Credit goes out to Chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak, who accepted the challenge set by the Sheikh Mansour and worked quickly with great responsibility to win the satisfaction of his English peers, who normally are hard to please.

The country had invested a lot into the club – through principal sponsors Etihad Airways to Etisalat, Aabar and Abu Dhabi Tourism and rightly so with this title win, Manchester City has returned the favor. Their success has triggered an awareness campaign with UAE as a nation, being the chief recipient.

Moreover, there could not be any sight, which could explain the feeling, better than that of several Sheikhs’ from Dubai and Abu Dhabi, celebrating the victory together.

BnbUEJNCQAA6knU.jpg


All we have achieved is what any country with similar interests in the same circumstance would have expected to achieve. As media goes cerebral over geometric outcomes, we (the nation) shall enjoy the various perks of being tagged with the champions of the English Premier League.<a class="postlink" href="http://www.footynions.com/2014/05/18/success-manchester-city-success-uae/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.footynions.com/2014/05/18/su ... ccess-uae/</a>

Is it me or in that first photo is SM indicating 5 with his right hand? 5 leaving? 5 coming in?
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Apologies if this question has already been asked. How realistic is it that a "directly affected" club will appeal these sanctions? I'd have thought that on balance it isn't worth doing because an appeal won't necessarily lead to greater sanctions being applied (it could even go the other way and we get a more lenient penalty), plus any club appealing could well piss us off to the extent that we refuse to do any future business with them.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

M18CTID said:
Apologies if this question has already been asked. How realistic is it that a "directly affected" club will appeal these sanctions? I'd have thought that on balance it isn't worth doing because an appeal won't necessarily lead to greater sanctions being applied (it could even go the other way and we get a more lenient penalty), plus any club appealing could well piss us off to the extent that we refuse to do any future business with them.
Not sure on the UEFA definition of "directly affected" but seeing as we've complied with Premier League FFP, which both Everton and Arsenal voted for, it's difficult to see either of those two clubs mounting a successful challenge. Surely, if it was to come from anywhere it would be CSKA Moscow or Pilsen as they are (or were, rather) "directly affected" by our putative non-compliance with FFP in the years to which our "non-compliance" applied. If we undisputedly abided by the rules of the Premier League last season how could anyone be "directly affected" by that? In that sense Arsenal may be hoisted by their own petard.


Arsenal and Everton have been 'indirectly affected' by our "non-compliance" with UEFA FFP imo.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.