Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
If RAWK all gathered together in one room, they'd drown in foam snd saliva.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,249
Bluemoon will continue to fume thoughNoticeable that this has already sunk to the bottom of the football pages on most newspapers.
It's what we do best!Bluemoon will continue to fume though
Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,373
I said this would happen with everything else going on this weekend but some guy eating beans on toast said that was outrageous.Noticeable that this has already sunk to the bottom of the football pages on most newspapers.
The Colonel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 2,040
Exactly. Not "on balance", not "some reasonable doubt", no "however", only "no evidence".No evidence…
It just never got reported this way, so the mud still stuck. And then there's the likes of Simon Jordan who in his pompous, ignorant ramblings pretends to talk with authority that we were still guilty!
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
Have you noticed someone on Twitter has called themselves Prestwich_Poo? Got to admit, I did laugh when I saw the name. You must have rattled him/her somewhere down the line.If RAWK all gathered together in one room, they'd drown in foam snd saliva.
If RAWK all gathered together in one room, they'd drown in foam snd saliva.
I think you will find that they would suffocate first with all those candles burning the oxygen.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
TBF, there's only 'no evidence' because they couldn't find any.Exactly. Not "on balance", not "some reasonable doubt", no "however", only "no evidence".
It just never got reported this way, so the mud still stuck. And then there's the likes of Simon Jordan who in his pompous, ignorant ramblings pretends to talk with authority that we were still guilty!
And yes, that was a joke...
The bad news is that those emails do certainly suggest that City were cooking the books and "attributing" Mansour funds to other Abu-Dhabi-related sponsorship deals. To be honest, I don't see how anyone can think we didn't do that. Your mileage just varies on how okay you are with that sort of thing going on behind the scenes.
The good news is that FFP was a bad idea anyway, and I don't think any of the above is remotely provable. Any good lawyer could surely argue that the wording instead meant "attribute" in the sense that we have to make it clear that we're attributing the funds to the right places so it doesn't look dodgy. It was a long time ago and based on an implication. A heavy implication, but an implication nonetheless. I'm fairly sure little will become of it overall.
O dear ! Please keep up.
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
You missed the entire CAS verdict and report I take it?The bad news is that those emails do certainly suggest that City were cooking the books and "attributing" Mansour funds to other Abu-Dhabi-related sponsorship deals. To be honest, I don't see how anyone can think we didn't do that. Your mileage just varies on how okay you are with that sort of thing going on behind the scenes.