Mr. Aguia
Well-Known Member
Re: City & FFP (continued)
Particularly if we put a bonus into his contract for UCL appearances no?
As posted earlier. Clearly UEFA aren't as confident as they have acted. If they were it would have been a take it or leave it type deal. The fact that they have postponed the decision, twice tells me they are desperate for us to accept their punishment. Clearly we haven't caved in, which I love. To me this is positive news. Worry that Arsenal will file a protest over any decision and drag this thing out all summer.
Bodicoteblue said:Given that Bosman won his case on the grounds of "freedom of employment " laws which are enshrined in the EU constitution, then could the situation arise where say , we had a deal agreed with say , Mangala ( though it could be anyone) , fees agreed with his club, personal terms agreed with the player , and then Uefa tried to place a squad restriction on City, and we were forced to tell the player that we could not include him in the CL squad, because of the restrictions placed on us, would the player not have a rock solid case under the freedom of employment regs.
The precedent has been set by Bosman and restrictions by Uefa of this kind have surely been outlawed! As a direct result of uefas actions , a player would have his rights curtailed.
This would surely mean that any sort of squad restriction would be a contravention of the law as has already been decided in court.
Particularly if we put a bonus into his contract for UCL appearances no?
As posted earlier. Clearly UEFA aren't as confident as they have acted. If they were it would have been a take it or leave it type deal. The fact that they have postponed the decision, twice tells me they are desperate for us to accept their punishment. Clearly we haven't caved in, which I love. To me this is positive news. Worry that Arsenal will file a protest over any decision and drag this thing out all summer.