City games allegedly fixed

The game v Norwich in 2013 (the real Norwich not the fake ones in Trafford) was reffed by someone I believe was named in the dossier. Early on he booked Tevez for a dive when he should have awarded us a penalty. In the end we blew them away but having had a ref I believe was highlighted as potentially suspect who made an early decision like that could have had more serious consequences.

I take it you mean the 7-0 when Phil Dowd was the ref. However, the game at Norwich near the end of the 2011-12 season was reffed by Chris Foy who gave a number of dodgy decisions against City early on but appeared to give it up as a bad job after Tevez and Aguero both scored spectacular goals from distance with City eventually running out 6-1 winners.
 
Same linesman working with Clattenberg in both games. Dodgy as fuck.

As a conspiracy advocate I had referees behind the media, the fa, fifa, and eufa in my list of priorities.

I just thought they were mostly shite.

Clsttenberg and dean the two I would most prefer when playing the top teams. The spurs match not included
 
As a conspiracy advocate I had referees behind the media, the fa, fifa, and eufa in my list of priorities.

I just thought they were mostly shite.

Clsttenberg and dean the two I would most prefer when playing the top teams. The spurs match not included
I'd prefer Clattenberg to any other ref in Pigmol.
The difference being he was his own cheat, the rest cheat on behalf of Pigmol.
 
That would be correct Bill but, if the case is that some games are already decided then why have no former or current linesmen, 4th officials, refs or even players ever come out and said that game x was rigged or referee x can be influenced?

You'd think by now that we'd have some concrete evidence to back corruption claims up. Those involved were greedy then and they'd be greedy now so if they were offered ££ for some dirt, they'd speak up.
PiGMOL officials sign a pretty robust confidentiality clause. I'm fairly certain they would get taken to the cleaners if they blabbed. However, I really don't think the PiGMOL would be the biggest of their worries if they opened their mouths. I bet there are more than one or two who are continually looking over their shoulders.
 
Had we been "good enough" in that game we'd have won it mate, we simply didn't put the ball in the net when we had numerous chances. Yes we were shafted by the officials in the game, but score when we should, and we still win it. Yes the red cards affected the following games too, but we won 2 of them, 1 against Arsenal included, the one we lost (Leicester) we were shite for 45 minutes (as well as shafted again by officials).

If the referee hadn't cheated and had sent Luis off, we would only been playing against 10 men which makes the game a lot easier wouldn't you agree? So we wouldn't have had to have been as good.

Other teams get that luxury of having slightly off days but not us, we have to be 100% in every game.
 
Not the best example of unfairness to be fair
I will grant you it's not blatant, in my eyes will be as dodgy as fuck decision, 11 mins into a derby and the rag player on the receiving end doesn't somersault but runs back after the ball. However tin hat it sounds but gift horse in mouth springs to mind
 
Had we been "good enough" in that game we'd have won it mate, we simply didn't put the ball in the net when we had numerous chances. Yes we were shafted by the officials in the game, but score when we should, and we still win it. Yes the red cards affected the following games too, but we won 2 of them, 1 against Arsenal included, the one we lost (Leicester) we were shite for 45 minutes (as well as shafted again by officials).
So wanted to say this but conspiracy theorists can be a very angry bunch.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.