City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

I won't bother linking it but Barney Ronay has come up with a very long and tedious pile of shite masquerading as an article in The Guardian. Basically we have won fuck all.
Aye. If you want absolute clarification that we were more successful than he could possibly admit it's the sentence referring to whole affair: "Who comes to sport to see this?"

He'll now scream and shout about the 115...blissfully unaware of what an absolute hypocrite and giant sized **** he is.
 
His incompetent and weak “leadership” is why we are here to begin with. If he had a backbone, he wouldn’t be so easily influenced by certain clubs/individuals and it’s likely we wouldn’t be facing an existential threat to our very existence.

We don’t want/need his help. He’s not a useful idiot, he’s just a slimy ****.

He should turn whistleblower. We all know some very dodgy shit has gone on behind the scenes with the ones who voted him into his position.
 
The issue of inflated sponsorship or sponsorship coming from our owner has been looked at by CAS. As I said, go read it if you want to comment. It's easy to find that specific discussion. They still reviewed evidence before confirming elements that were time barred so procedurally invalid and made their comments on both the evidence and procedure. Educate yourself or don't comment at all.

And stop looking for a bright side for your discredited owners. Guilty as fuck, and it's now going to cost you by way of your finances.

Que sera
 
I don't understand, for the love of God, why the PL doesn't just adopt the same financial rules as UEFA. The top seven clubs have to comply with them anyway. Even do away with FFP for clubs not in Europe.

Why not do something simple instead of something mind-bogglingly complicated (and crazy expensive).

The award says the PL has had to beef up its APT team to handle the workload and has even had to pay Nielsen more to beef up their team as well? Is it all worth it?

You’re forgetting why they were introduced.
 
As I say I don’t think 7 clubs will vote the PL down indeed the panel’s verdict probably gives the PL a clear line of sight in terms of how an independent panel will view matters going forward
I don’t like using the phrase red herrings in relation to owners loans but sorry I think this is being a little overstated in terms of this aspect of the ruling. One way or another the owners will work round this my guess re Chelsea this was as much to do with their plans going forward in terms of associated sponsorship or more likely something to do with the multi club plans concerns re a sum is nothing more than a sum that will increase the costs for PSR but simply won’t see the owners receiving any income

You continually miss the point.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.